Search for: "Blow v. State" Results 481 - 500 of 3,286
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In the space below, I describe yet another blow to the California statutes and constitutional provisions that set up the Golden State’s direct democracy system. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 6:10 am
CATO had an interesting write up on the Liberty University v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 9:30 am by Viking
App. 2005), for cases where the accused blows providency or the MJ declines to accept the plea; United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 9:00 am by Suzanne Ilene Schiller
Since the United States Supreme Court decided Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 10:50 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) and “no witness with a degree in scatology was required, nor was scientific testing required to establish the fact the substance was feces,” at least on the facts of this particular case (State v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 1:28 pm by Lyle Denniston
Quoting from the Bible — not the usual source of legal wisdom — the Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a government rule that will parcel out the duty to stop or at least reduce dirty air from blowing from one state into another. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 5:03 am
Thursdays seem popular for delivering Advocate Generals' Opinions on intellectual property matters, and today -- having dealt a firm blow to the prospect of patenting of human stem cells -- Europe's Finest are now advising the Court of Justice on copyright too. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 11:04 am by Lisa Whittaker
Ball State University (which we blogged on here), the United States Supreme Court finished employees off with the 5-4 decision in University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 8:32 am by Lawrence Taylor
Strieff, the United States Supreme Court dealt yet another blow to what few rights still remain, even in non-DUI cases. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 6:29 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Kingsley now applies to street people.The Court therefore holds that plaintiffs state a cause of action, as the complaint does not show the police had any reason to blow their ears off with that Navy sound blaster. [read post]