Search for: "Board of Directors v. Superior Court"
Results 481 - 500
of 542
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Innovationpartners) Germany Ferrero v FIFA (in World Cup trade mark dispute) – 1:0 says the German Bundesgerichtshof (IPKat) India WIPO Director General pledges support for India’s visually impaired community (WIPO) Delhi High Court on working of patents and S 107A(b) Strix Limited v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Innovationpartners) Germany Ferrero v FIFA (in World Cup trade mark dispute) - 1:0 says the German Bundesgerichtshof (IPKat) India WIPO Director General pledges support for India's visually impaired community (WIPO) Delhi High Court on working of patents and S 107A(b) Strix Limited v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
“Maricopa County’s particulate air pollution is a serious problem,” said Deborah Jordan, director of the Air Division in the EPA’s Pacific Southwest office. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 11:25 am
(Terago), on whose board both individual defendants served. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 5:01 am
The Supreme Court recently scheduled oral arguments in Jones v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 5:17 pm
Commonwealth Human Relations Comm'n v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 10:28 pm
by Christian Stegmaiercstegmaier@collinsandlacy.comIn a July 1, 2009, opinion in Trowell v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 4:42 pm
In Kitzmiller v. [read post]
30 May 2009, 4:57 pm
The demand letter urged the board to stop the merger because it had received a "superior offer" of one dollar more per share. [read post]
4 May 2009, 11:25 am
The North Carolina Supreme Court issued its ruling in North Carolina Department of Corrections v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 10:00 am
On Wednesday, March 25, 2009, the Delaware Supreme Court issued an opinion reversing the Chancery Court's decision in Ryan v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(IP finance) Global - Patents Study published in Science magazine ‘Promoting Intellectual Discovery: Patents Versus Markets’ concludes free markets superior to patent monopolies (Ars Technica) (Techdirt) Economic woes impact valuations, but not all sectors are suffering (Technology Transfer Tactics) Cancer Institute study show impact of patent age on deal probability (Technology Transfer Tactics) Should management be involved in patenting decisions? [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 6:37 pm
Superior Court had dealt with a very different issue. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Canadian Trademark Blog) CIPO Trademarks Opposition Board revising procedures, effective 31 March 2009 (Daily Dose of IP) (ipblog.ca) China China patent reform. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
We are examining the recent decision by the Delaware Supreme Court in Gantler v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 12:34 pm
Superior Trading Co. (1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 324, 328; O'Hara v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 10:57 am
Ironically, the main California precedent that the court invoked was a 1998 decision by the California Supreme Court, Curran v. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 12:12 pm
” Since the Board followed all the appropriate procedures, the Superior Court upheld the Court of Common Pleas’ holding that the Board’s decision not to pursue litigation was protected under the business judgment rule: 'Decisions regarding litigation by or on behalf of a corporation, including shareholder derivative actions, are business decisions as much as any other financial decision. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 12:01 pm
Dec. 19, 2008)Absence of 50(b) motion in the trial court deprives Appeals Court of ability to consider AT&T's appeal from J* for EEOC on its religion (Jehovah's Witnesses)/failure-to-accommodate, discharge discrim suitDC Circuit* Adams v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 2:03 pm
Because the business judgment rule applies to decisions made by the board of directors, as opposed to corporate officers or other representatives, all significant decisions – to the extent possible – should be made, or ratified, by the board. [read post]
