Search for: "Bowles v. Wells" Results 481 - 500 of 538
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2008, 6:35 pm
But it cannot change a well established course of action without supplying notice of and a reasoned explanation for its policy departure. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 12:13 am
This young person celebrates the laudatory trait of patriotism, defying generational expectations.I also signed away my rights to any patents (sucks, but well, I'm not a scientist, so it doesn't matter to me, and yet I am bothered by this for many property/labor law reasons), and agreed not to abuse drugs. [read post]
17 May 2008, 5:14 pm
The California Supreme Court relied on its own decision invalidating an anti-miscegenation law, Perez v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 11:29 am
"It is unseemly -- to say the least -- that Kentucky may well kill [its condemned prisoners] using a drug that it would not permit to be used on their pets," Stevens said.The decision in Baze v. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 3:40 pm by Robichaud
  (Incidentally, at trial I asked the officer “If I was to push a bowling ball down a hill and it smashes into your car, would you say that I caused the damage, or the bowling ball?). [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 10:00 pm
While most Americans who watched Sunday's Super Bowl XLII were thrilled with a close game that wasn't decided until the final seconds, Financial Times ($) Simon Kuper examines why American football does not translate well to other cultures: . . . few foreigners watch American sports. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 8:56 am
Plus there is some chance that the Wyeth v. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 10:22 am
, recently sex offenders fared pretty well in the circuit. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 2:28 pm
and a reference to the fact that in less than a year we have seen 3 high-profile cases in which a litigant paid dearly for missing a deadline.First, we had the Supreme Court's outrageous decision in Bowles v. [read post]