Search for: "Brooks v. Powers"
Results 481 - 500
of 691
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2020, 9:09 am
Brooks, 287 N.C. 392 (1975). [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 2:27 pm
Loewy’s article Cops, Cars, and Citizens: Fixing the Broken Balance was cited in the following article: Henry Patrick, South Dakota v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 12:58 pm
Russian President Vladimir V. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 8:00 pm
: (IPEG),More on the implementation of the London Agreement and patent cost reduction in Europe: (Patent Baristas),ECJ rules that EU legislative obligations cannot be enforced in any Member State if that legislation has not been published in the Official Journal in the language of that Member State (Case C-161/06 OlomoucSkoma-Lux sro v Celni reditelstvi Olumouc): (IPKat),EPO fighting complex appl [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 11:54 pm
College London"Feminism v. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
The agency explained that the ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 12:39 pm
S.E.C. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 4:44 am
It proposes that the draft Bill should include a definition of what is meant by ‘contempt of Parliament’ and that the Bill should codify Parliament’s powers to impose sanctions, including a power for the House of Commons to fine. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit’s decision in Zen Magnets v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 10:28 am
Brooks, JudgeRepresenting Appellant (Plaintiffs): Jerry M. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 6:55 am
In conjunction with the summit, Brookings scholar William McCants published a special edition of the Foreign Policy Essay, which offered some guidance on what anti-radicalization programs should and shouldn’t do. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
William Powers Jr., ed. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 3:27 pm
Professor Loewy’s article Statutory Rape in a Post Lawrence v. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 10:40 pm
Brooks et al, 1999 BCCA 623 (sub nom. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:50 am
UMG v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
Appellate Division, Third Department Improper to discredit Respondent’s denial of paternity on the basis that he never definitively took steps to dissuade the child or anyone else that he was NOT the father In Matter of Montgomery County Dept of Social Services o/b/o Donavin E, v Trini G 195 A.D.3d 1069, 149 N.Y.S.3d 667 (3d Dept.,2021) petitioner commenced a proceeding seeking… [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
Here is why (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Innovative methods for corporate legal managers to reduce IP counsel costs (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) The malign and the benign of the transfer of know-how (IP finance) How to avoid potential conflict when inventors want their innovations back (Technology Transfer Tactics) 50% of venture capital investment is lost: How your clients can improve these odds by using the right patent analytics (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) New website, Intellogist, compares patent search… [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 9:04 pm
They cannot be questioned, voted out of office, or forced from power. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 10:43 am
Under the Supreme Court’s decision in Powell v. [read post]
