Search for: "Brown v. State of North Carolina"
Results 481 - 500
of 527
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2009, 10:01 pm
Brown, Esq. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 1:35 pm
Personal Jurisdiction The opinion in Brown v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(Brown was a citizen of North Carolina. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 7:56 am
Several organizations such as National League of Cities, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, and the Washington Legal Foundation, filed amici curiae Briefs The central players in this case include the Graham County water district from North Carolina and a former secretary at Graham County water district. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 2:54 pm
The Court ruled that there was jurisdiction over the out-of-state defendant in North Carolina even though the defendant had "never set foot in the State of North Carolina. [read post]
1 May 2009, 6:44 am
Browning Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
Metro-North Commuter Railroad Co. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 10:01 am
Browne Drug Co. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 7:44 am
The Opinion is in Brown Brothers Harriman Trust Co. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
Va. 2004); Brown v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:53 pm
" To support this, he relied on Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
Zaden v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
On Friday evening, just a day after a New York state court judge ruled against shareholders contesting JPMorgan's purchase of Bear Stearns, a North Carolina state court judge denied a request for a preliminary injunction that would have halted the merger between Wells Fargo and Wachovia. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 2:48 am
Although the Supreme Court had decided Brown v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 10:09 am
North Carolina and Indiana would become deadlocked by an even smaller degree of movement. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 8:46 am
Browning Jr., North Carolina's solicitor general, defended the decision of officials there to violate a state law in order to create a district that included about 39 percent of the black voting-age population, saying the Voting Rights Act required the creation of the district to prevent the dilution of the minority group's ability to elect a representative of its choice.The fact that the district did not include a majority of black voters was a virtue,… [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 9:01 pm
As soon as North Carolina’s solicitor general, Christopher G. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
North Carolina Solicitor General Christopher Browning, Jr., will argue for the petitioner, and Carl Thurman, III, of Wilmington, N.C., and Daryl Joseffer of the Solicitor General’s office will argue for the respondent. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 637 F.2d 8, 90-91 (2d Cir. 1980).North Carolina: N.C. [read post]
