Search for: "Burke v. Burke"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,446
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2013, 10:04 am
Summary of Decision August 13, 2013Justice Burke delivered the opinion for the Court. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 7:27 pm
Walker, Jr. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 1:28 pm
McLAURY v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 9:53 am
McCALLIE v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
"Noting that there are some exceptions to the "violation of public policy" prohibition, the Appellate Division, citing Burke v Bowen, 40 NY2d 264, opined that a job security provision "does not violate public policy and therefore is valid and enforceable, but only if the provision is 'explicit,' the CBA [collective bargaining agreement] extends for a 'reasonable period of time,' and the 'CBA was not negotiated in a period of a… [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
"Noting that there are some exceptions to the "violation of public policy" prohibition, the Appellate Division, citing Burke v Bowen, 40 NY2d 264, opined that a job security provision "does not violate public policy and therefore is valid and enforceable, but only if the provision is 'explicit,' the CBA [collective bargaining agreement] extends for a 'reasonable period of time,' and the 'CBA was not negotiated in a period of a… [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:59 am
Reversed and Remanded.Case Name: TED NOBLES v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 7:40 pm
In Toftoy v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 11:59 am
OLSEN v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 5:00 am
During its May term, the Illinois Supreme Court heard oral argument in Gurba v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:51 am
Burk: utility models/industrial design can seem to have some blend of tools/aspects on continuum: registration v. full examination; other countries may have filled in the gaps better than we have. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 9:40 am
” See, Burke, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 1:24 pm
Burke, 504 U.S. 229 (1992). [read post]
19 May 2010, 8:06 am
Burks v. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 9:41 pm
Barbie v. [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 5:48 am
Burke v. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 1:49 pm
In the closing days of its September term, the Illinois Supreme Court heard oral argument in Petrovic v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 4:44 am
In support of their respective motions pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(5), each of the defendants demonstrated, prima facie, that the time in which to sue had expired and that the complaint was time-barred as against them (see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 785 N.E.2d 714, 755 N.Y.S.2d 693; Sabadie v Burke, 47 AD3d 913, 849 N.Y.S.2d 440; Matter of Schwartz, 44 AD3d 779, 843 N.Y.S.2d 403; Savarese v Shatz, 273 AD2d 219, 708 N.Y.S.2d 642; CPLR 214[6]). [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 6:05 am
Hospira v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:29 am
For example, in the Minnesota case of Burke v. [read post]
