Search for: "C. G., Matter of"
Results 481 - 500
of 3,974
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2015, 10:02 pm
Louis Sands to approve a $1,000 payment to hire Farrell C. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 4:47 am
§ 1030(g). [read post]
27 Apr 2013, 10:19 am
The order can be broad or narrow, and the bill gives the courts wide latitude:9 (1) A protection order may include any of the following provisions that the justice considers necessary or advisable for the protection of the subject:(a) a provision prohibiting the respondent from engaging in cyberbullying;(b) a provision restricting or prohibiting the respondent from, directly or indirectly, communicating with or contacting the subject or a specified person;(c) a provision restricting or… [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 1:15 am
As a matter of fact, the Enlarged Board has analysed and endorsed the established jurisprudence in point 26 of the reasons for the decision:"... [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 3:17 am
Marco Buzzoni, Doctoral Researcher at the Luxembourg Centre for European Law (LCEL) and PhD candidate at the Sorbonne Law School, offers a critical analysis of some recent rulings by the Court of Justice of the European Union in matters of data protection. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 6:46 am
L. c. 150E. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 3:35 am
Based on the 92-page decision by District of Columbia Judge Emmett G. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:03 am
R (on the application of G) v The Governors of X School, heard 11 – 12 April 2011. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 1:30 am
It is established case law that claimed subject-matter is not excluded from patentability as a non-invention under Article 52(2) EPC for the sole reason that it contains features which might be considered to be non-technical (see opinion G 3/08, OJ EPO 2011, 10, point 10.13 of the Reasons, and decision T 1658/06 of 14 January 2011, point 3 of the Reasons). [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 9:56 am
Buy a bronze Gömböc for £819 here. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 2:00 pm
Ironically, Ted G. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 5:32 pm
� 1604(g)(3)(B). [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 5:56 am
Kim, and Nicholas G. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 11:46 am
§ 130(g). [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 9:24 am
This Blog/Blawg, NJ Family Issues, is managed by Paul G. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 8:57 am
Accordingly, in his view, the claimant was entitled to the procedural protection provided, specifically for criminal proceedings, in Article 6(3)(c) and (d). [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:44 am
Weill appealed a decision by Justice Leland G. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 11:44 am
The remaining Comments have been renumbered; Rule 7.2(c)(2), and new Comment [8] to Rule 7.2, are amended to require that the legal service plan or not-for-profit lawyer referral service not be acting in violation of any Rules of Professional Conduct; Rule 7.2(f) is deleted and sections (g), (h), and (i) of the rule are re-designated as sections (f), (g), and (h); New Comment [6] to Rule 7.2 is amended to state that it is the responsibility of the lawyer who… [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 10:29 am
Elizabeth G. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 10:48 am
Below, the (A)(1)(a) section says that if the officer believes you are under the influence of alcohol he can charge you with a DUI no matter what level of alcohol is in your system. [read post]
