Search for: "CALIFORNIA POWER EXCHANGE CORPORATION" Results 481 - 500 of 694
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2013, 9:14 am by Allison Tussey
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced the charges. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 12:50 pm by Mary Jane Wilmoth
., Praetorian G Power I, LLC, Praetorian G Power II, LLC, Praetorian G Power IV, LLC, Praetorian G Power V, LLC, Praetorian G Power VI, LLC, David E. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
But a California federal judge rejected the argument that the land investments didn’t count as securities. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
But a California federal judge rejected the argument that the land investments didn’t count as securities. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 7:41 am by Ed Felten
But there are limits to the power of this regulatory approach, due to the limited power of the developers who govern the Bitcoin reference software. [read post]
14 May 2013, 7:19 am by Cormac Early
In The New Republic, Simon Lazarus reports on a challenge to the federal government’s power to create health-insurance exchanges under the Affordable Care Act, currently pending before a federal district court in Washington, D.C., which might give the Supreme Court “another chance to gut Obamacare. [read post]
5 May 2013, 9:30 pm by Heather Gerken and Theodore Ruger
Anyone who has run an agency or a corporation knows well how much power administrators wield. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 7:00 am by Jay Stanley
” In fact, the poll, which was conducted by the University of Southern California’s corporate-partnered Center for the Digital Future, showed no such thing. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 9:49 am by Sheppard Mullin
“Plaintiff is not present in one of those other courts…” This exchange, however, does emphasize the limited application of this trio of decisions to those suits by non-residents or foreign corporations in the California courts. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 5:49 am by Edwin Komen
“Plaintiff is not present in one of those other courts…” This exchange, however, does emphasize the limited application of this trio of decisions to those suits by non-residents or foreign corporations in the California courts. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 4:49 am by Dennis Crouch
Because of the strong public interest in the operation of the patent system and its impact on the public, I believe that the exchange of patent rights should not be exposed to the benefits and disadvantages of the free market system without a careful consideration of whether additional controls should be applied to ensure that the market operates efficiently and fairly for the participants, while supporting (or at least not harming) the interests of the public [6]. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 7:55 am by Ken
Updated: I have communicated with the principal of the California corporation named "On Press, Inc [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 7:35 am by Broc Romanek
Failing to recognize that the California General Corporation Law applies. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm by Robert B. Milligan
By Robert Milligan and Joshua Salinas As part of our annual tradition, here is our list of the top 10 developments/headlines in trade secret, computer fraud, and non-compete law for 2012. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm by Robert B. Milligan
By Robert Milligan and Joshua Salinas As part of our annual tradition, here is our list of the top 10 developments/headlines in trade secret, computer fraud, and non-compete law for 2012. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:01 pm by Andrew Mirsky
“Padmapper’s use of exchange posting is not infringing use. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 10:38 am by Andrew & Danielle Mayoras
  The same United States District Court in California ruled against Shuster's heirs and in favor of Warner and DC. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 12:37 pm by Adrian Lurssen
JD Supra Contributors in the News: Duane Morris in Law.com’s Corporate Counsel: - As U.S. [read post]