Search for: "CALIFORNIA v. WASHINGTON"
Results 481 - 500
of 4,203
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2007, 1:25 pm
Washington (2004) 542 U.S. 296(Blakely). [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 9:47 am
" As emerging technologies upend societal expectations of privacy, some legal experts point to People v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 9:00 am
” State v. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 4:55 am
"
Associated Press/Washington Post
See opinion (Carey v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 2:01 pm
City of Sacramento, California v. [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 8:28 am
Washington, 2024). [read post]
31 May 2022, 5:35 am
Both reside, at least part time in California, but neither chose to file their claims in a California court. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 5:50 am
The Court has a case on its docket involving that very dispute, and Tuesday’s ruling will be followed up soon, perhaps by next week, with action on that case — California Regents v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
Some have called Moore v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 8:47 am
Washington Post reports on the Court's grant of review. [read post]
22 Nov 2018, 4:05 am
In East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 2:17 pm
Our initial look at Washington’s and California’s responses is here. [read post]
23 May 2015, 12:30 am
The schedule for Fall 2015 for the Washington History seminar is out. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 2:35 pm
LEXIS 14141 (ED CA, Feb. 1, 2017), a California federal magistrate judge recommended dismissing a Muslim inmate's claim that denial of conjugal visits infringes his free exercise rights and his right to marry.In Hall v. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 10:00 am
LEXIS 157934 (WD WA, Nov. 4,2013), a Washington federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2013 U.S. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 4:26 am
In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that yesterday’s other grant, in District of Columbia v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 5:52 am
The case, titled Casey Taylor, et al. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 10:54 pm
” In The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin previews this Term’s oral arguments in Sandifer v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 3:02 am
California Supreme Court ruling on employee classification (Dynamex) expected to deal blow to gig economy [TaxProf, Bloomberg Daily Labor Report] Attorney fee request shows part of what’s wrong with Fair Labor Standards Act [Jon Hyman] Ninth Circuit: offshore platform workers entitled to hourly pay for 24 hours/day, including time sleeping [WLF on Newton v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 2:58 am
” [Lori Rozsa, Washington Post, Erin Dunne, Washington Examiner (“fix the marijuana banking mess”)] Survey: “Average cost of a settled merger-objection claim has increased 63% to $4.5 million over four years, with little benefit to shareholders” [Chubb] “Time for Another Round of Securities Class Action Litigation Reform? [read post]
