Search for: "CO John Doe No. 2"
Results 481 - 500
of 3,044
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2011, 8:43 am
My name is John A. [read post]
5 May 2015, 8:00 am
” 2. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 5:29 am
It does not require specific individuals to be named. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 8:48 pm
(TTABlogged here).Text Copyright John L. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:56 am
Case Name: Stewart Title Guaranty Co. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 4:00 am
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) 2. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 4:00 am
Emerson Electric Co., Oppositions Nos. 91158891 and 91158941 (March 23, 2007) [precedential], it ruled that Opposer B&D had established a family of "HOG" marks for power-operated outdoor equipment. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 1:32 pm
The Copyright Act does not protect general ideas, such as a romance between a western man and a woman from behind the iron curtain, but only the particular expression of an idea.Read More: Elton John, Bernie Taupin Win Dismissal of Suit Claiming They Stole ‘Nikita’ LyricsKimble v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 3:23 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 3:56 am
"That this mark and the cited mark co-exist tells us nothing about whether applicant’s mark, which does not include a unique second element such as DEJOINE, is similar to the cited mark." [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 4:24 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 4:28 am
John Doe, No. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 3:33 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 5:05 am
By John M. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 2:54 am
On October 16, UIC John Marshall Law School is organizing its International IP Practice Seminar. [read post]
13 May 2014, 10:48 am
Presumably, Lipukhin's name was one of the more than 4,000 names that were turned over to the IRS several years ago in response to a John Doe summons served on UBS. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 3:52 am
Therefore the Section 2(d) claim was dismissed.Fraud: To establish a fraud claim, intent to deceive the USPTO must be proven by clear and convincing evidence. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 5:21 am
The 7-2 decision focused on the standard of proof relative to the threats that were made, holding that mere negligence -the failure to appreciate a legal risk- was insufficient to support a criminal conviction.If the Third Circuit orders a new trial, which is now possible due to the remand, Elonis could avail himself of a convincing double jeopardy argument. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 3:45 am
Applicant's assertion that the marks have co-existed peacefully in other countries was irrelevant here. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:00 am
Co. of America v. [read post]
