Search for: "COATS v. STATE"
Results 481 - 500
of 853
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2019, 9:06 am
It was just a few months ago that the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) (BMB v Ferrero, C‑693/17 P) sided with well-known foodstuffs manufacturer Ferrero by upholding the invalidity of a registered Community design right for comfit boxes and containers pursuant to Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation No 6/2002. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 2:33 am
., KG v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 1:59 pm
More recently Megaupload, the uber-famous peer-to-peer platform, was shut down in 2012 and the United States Department of Justice commenced criminal actions against its owners. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 2:09 am
In order to produce an image on canvas, a synthetic coating (laminate) is first applied [by Allposters] to a paper poster depicting the chosen work [for which the copyright is managed by Pictoright]. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
Pretrial activities in United States v. al-Nashiri shifted focus Nov. 8 and 10, as the prosecution began presenting witnesses and physical evidence from the USS Cole for preadmission by presiding judge Col. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:38 am
(See the policy reasoning in Renna v. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 7:32 am
Security Council passed a resolution condemning Israeli settlements with the United States abstaining. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
United States. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:30 am
Thorogood v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:30 am
Thorogood v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 3:55 pm
In Jones v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 8:39 am
Today, in Utah v. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 7:49 pm
" Coy v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 2:19 pm
As stated by Gene DeMaio (EVP, Options Regulation Section of FINRA’s Market Regulation Department), CAT has been a “game changer” particularly for option regulation because it provides FINRA with data points not previously available under the COATS reporting regime, and thus, the industry should expect more streamlined and targeted options-related investigations. [read post]
4 May 2010, 1:08 pm
As this court explained in State v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 3:15 pm
The first is Lucia v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 10:33 am
Indeed, while under Article 52(1)(a) CTMR the application date is the seminal moment for the examination invalidity grounds, examiners and Courts are free to consider any material subsequent to the date of application insofar as it enables conclusions to be drawn with regard to the situation as it was on that date [see the CJEU’s orders in Alcon v OHIM, in Case C-192/03P, and Torresan v OHIM, in Case C-5/10]. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 11:17 am
Ltd v Aiwa Corp. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 1:40 pm
See Harmelin v. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 6:31 pm
In Crawford v. [read post]
