Search for: "CONFIDENTIAL INFORMANT v. US "
Results 481 - 500
of 7,770
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2023, 10:00 am
Attendees had no confidentiality obligations and “were not provided any gene or breeding information. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 4:30 am
" Ombuds Time: 12:45pm 4:00pm Special Tools for Ombuds to Use in their Careers: Providing Upward Feedback and Fostering DEIB through Photovoice Facilitator: Birthe Reimers, Ombuds, Georgia State UniversityOmbuds offices provide safe and confidential spaces where visitors can share their experiences and determine ways to manage conflicts informally (Hollis, 2021). [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 9:45 am
Call us today at [[phone]] to schedule a confidential first meeting with one of our Kane County, IL divorce attorneys. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 12:29 pm
Fair use occurs when a trademark is used for its primary rather than a secondary meaning and in good faith. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 6:03 am
The failure to provide the Court with this specific information weighs against B.L.'s claim of confidentiality. [read post]
11 Feb 2023, 5:14 am
The MINAE also held that the information deemed confidential could be used by third parties with fraudulent purposes or be misinterpreted. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 7:51 pm
Ltd. and Others v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 10:28 am
Some states go further by granting protection to confidential information that are not trade secrets. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 7:57 am
The source that was credited in those tweets--an EU antitrust lawyer who uses the "Idas" pseudonym to comment on a discussion board for gamers--normally provides accurate information about the Microsoft-ActivisionBlizzard merger reviews around the globe, but in this case he was wrong: his misconception presumably was that he saw the ALJ's order granting the third motion for an extension, but that one had been agreed upon between Sony and Microsoft, and the question… [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 3:33 pm
In United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 8:19 am
Federal Trade Comm’n v. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 10:50 pm
In PayPal, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 3:10 pm
In Société Nationale Industrielle Aérospatiale v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
” By this point, Texas v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 3:59 am
Gossman and Gordon V. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 6:25 am
Cir.) -- reversing and remanding district court’s decision and concluding that: (1) agency failed to establish that the names of companies that supply the government with a drug used for lethal injections qualify as “commercial” information under Exemption 4; and (2) agency failed to show how certain “key contract terms” were “confidential” under Exemption 4.Sherven v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 11:00 pm
In the case of Puricelli v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 11:33 am
Cameron v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 10:19 am
The information was therefore "genuinely commercially confidential" and "disclosure...could prejudice Oxford or a third party". [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 7:46 am
Valuable confidential business or professional information that otherwise does not qualify as trade secrets. [read post]
