Search for: "COOPER v. STATE OF FLORIDA" Results 481 - 500 of 651
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” I have no particular brief for high Federalists from New England, but I do wonder what we might think had Garrison actually been influential and several New England states accepted his view and tried to secede, say, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Prigg v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 1:13 am by Kevin LaCroix
  However, just four days after she allowed the plaintiffs’ claims to proceed with respect to those three offerings, the Second Circuit released its decision in Fait v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 1:13 am by Kevin LaCroix
  However, just four days after she allowed the plaintiffs’ claims to proceed with respect to those three offerings, the Second Circuit released its decision in Fait v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Tucker Carlson Just Inadvertently Helped Raise $14,000 for Abortion Rights MSN – Steven Zeitchik (Washington Post) | Published: 6/27/2022 Hours after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 2:39 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
For example, Lee cites Justice Grier's dissent in O'Reilly v. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 2:01 am
The most interesting analysis was contained in Gilbert v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 12:21 pm by Kevin Pitts
Some counties in Central Florida tend to reward cooperation to some extent. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
While is why the Sixth Circuit (over a dissent) just applied Chevron and Rust v. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
As the debate goes on over the Affordable Care Act, and the Supreme Court considers the arguments it has heard over attempts to strike down the legislation, the Court handed down its judgment in FAA v Cooper (10-1024 03/28/2012). [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:28 am by Kiran Bhat
Monday in Florida v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit reversed in relevant part, rejecting the states’ nondelegation challenge; the court also concluded other claims were time-barred because the states acted more than a decade after CMS promulgated the rule. [read post]