Search for: "California v. Russell"
Results 481 - 500
of 750
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2014, 3:29 pm
Jeremy gives the floor to Nick Briggs and Kerry Russell (Shakespeares), who report on 118 Data Resource Limited v IDS Data Services Limited and others [2014] EWHC 3629 (Ch), a High Court, England and Wales, ruling of Deputy Judge David Halpern QC, in which they represented the defendants. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
1 May 2014, 8:31 am
California and United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:36 am
Independent Living Center of Southern California . . . . [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 9:32 am
(Disclosure: Kevin of Howe & Russell represents the petitioner.) [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 1:30 pm
City of Newport Beach, California v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:30 am
Perry, the challenge to California’s ban on same-sex marriage. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:29 am
POM Wonderful v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 7:21 am
California, 13-494, is literally straight outta Compton. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 12:10 pm
And in California Public Employees Retirement System v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm
Opinion below (10th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioners’ reply Amicus brief of the American Legion Department of California Amicus brief of nine states Title: CropLife America v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am
California, 13-494, a capital case involving a Batson challenge arising out of a crime allegedly committed in California’s newest entrepreneurial hot spot. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 5:45 am
Related articles Transitional Alimony Lowered in Clarksville Divorce: Russell v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 9:08 am
The case involves a California rule barring review of claims that were not raised on direct appeal. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:45 am
California, in which music producer Phil Spector sought review of his murder conviction. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
Thomas McDonnell blogged about “Murphy’s Law of Tax” and Ian Gamble described the findings in Henco Industries v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 2:30 pm
/**/ by James Kachmar In Cristoff v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am
California, 14-5442. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 1:51 pm
California Teachers Association and Janus v. [read post]
