Search for: "Callahan V Cir*"
Results 481 - 500
of 528
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2008, 11:03 pm
Callahan states as follows.Mr. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 10:59 pm
No. 07A630 Title: James Callahan, Applicant [www.supremecourtus.gov] v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 12:55 pm
His application (Callahan v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 6:30 am
Callahan v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 6:28 am
Baze v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 6:46 am
Jackson v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 1:21 pm
And which he does here, in which he writes a concurrence (joined by Judges Wardlaw, Paez, and Bea) that responds to a concurrence by Judge Gould (joined by Judges O'Scannlain, Rymer, Silverman, Callahan, and Ikuta) that adopts a starkly different view, albiet resulting in the same result, than the majority opinion.That said, for all the similarities, and for all the (great) directness, Chief Judge Kozinski's concurrence is nonetheless, I think, a tiny bit mellower than usual. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 6:14 am
U.S. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 12:01 pm
In an opinion by Judge Callahan, no less.Which seems right.So there you have it. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 10:12 am
Callahan, a matter I have worked on over the last few months. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 12:27 pm
This is a very good opinion by Judge Callahan. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 11:34 am
Especially since this particular panel includes, among others, Judges Clifton, Callahan, Bybee, etc.For what it's worth, I don't think that Judge Ikuta comes off very good in this one. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 10:54 pm
Supreme Court rules in the Kentucky case, Baze v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 12:42 pm
But Judge Kozinski (joined by Judges Kleinfeld, Clifton, and Callahan) dissents from the dismissal of the appeal, and makes some very cogent points. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 12:21 pm
" Callahan, J., dissenting, id. at *13. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 2:52 am
Kozinski also files a separate dissent, also joined by Clifton, Bybee and Callahan, argues that the Supremes in Gonzales v. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 1:44 am
See United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 3:28 pm
Anyone who thinks otherwise is just plain foolish.It's a total coincidence that, in this immigration case, the ones who dissent from the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc are Judges O'Scannlain, Kozinski, Kleinfeld, Tallman, Bybee, Bea, Callahan, M. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 10:14 pm
" In Communications Workers v. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 11:07 am
In the case of Mountain Empire Oil Co. v. [read post]
