Search for: "Chambers v. State of Texas" Results 481 - 500 of 698
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2011, 3:21 pm by Kent Scheidegger
S. ___, ___ (2009) (slip op., at 2) (BREYER, J., in chambers), and our task should be at an end. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 8:41 am by Bill Otis
As the Independence Day weekend begins, the Department has filed this astounding application to stay the execution of a Mexican national by the State of Texas. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 10:00 am by PunditMom
   Scalia’s opinion addressed the procedural questions it had to and then swiftly and deftly in just a few pages, made it clear, yet again, that blind justice isn’t blind at all and, apparently, is on the side of big corporate political donors and the United States Chamber of Commerce. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am by Marie Louise
Activ8-3D (EPLAW) EWPCC deals with unregistered designs: Access plus inspiration need not mean copying: Albert Packaging v Nampak (Class 99) (IPKat) United States US Patent Reform Patent Reform Update: Will the House pass America Invents Act? [read post]
28 May 2011, 6:57 pm by Dan Farber
  That determination is now being challenged by states such as Texas and Virginia and various other parties like the Chamber of Commerce. [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:57 pm by Ann Carlson
Chamber of Commerce and the Competitive Enterprise Institute  but also three states (Texas, Alabama and Montana). [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
 At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 1:04 pm by WIMS
    On February 23, 2011, in response to Federal court orders in Sierra Club v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 8:30 pm by cdw
From this week’s intro: Leading off this edition is a case missed last week, the Missouri Supreme Court’s decision in State v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 11:21 am by Christa Culver
The Peoples Gas, Light and Coke Co.Docket: 10-896Issue(s): Whether the dormant Commerce Clause prohibits a State from imposing a generally applicable, nondiscriminatory ad valorem tax on natural gas stored in the State but connected to an interstate pipeline system for out-of-state transport.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (Court of Appeals of Texas, Sixth District)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of Chambers County… [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am by Marie Louise
(Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Judge Ward affirms $482,000,000 damages award, but overturns willfulness finding: Saffran, M.D., Ph.D., v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 11:03 am by Kiran Bhat
The Peoples Gas, Light and Coke Co.Docket: 10-896Issue(s): Whether the dormant Commerce Clause prohibits a State from imposing a generally applicable, nondiscriminatory ad valorem tax on natural gas stored in the State but connected to an interstate pipeline system for out-of-state transport.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (Court of Appeals of Texas, Sixth District)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of Chambers County… [read post]