Search for: "Colony v. Colony" Results 481 - 500 of 1,826
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Canadian Association of Law Libraries
It also discusses colonial rebellions, the Red River and North- West resistances, the Six Nations appeal for justice to the League of Nations, and legislation created in response to and aimed at quelling resistance. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
In Michel v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 10:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
 Table of Contents after the jump: I Introduction 1 II Provincial Autonomy and Its (Anti)Colonial Limits, 1935–8 34 III Conundrum on the Eve of Decolonization: Politics of Constitutionalism, 1945–6 68 IV Rau’s Constitutional Solutions to the Political Conundrum 122 V Moment of Utopia: Rau and a Constitution above Politics 163 VI A Civil Servant’s Adieu: The Burden of History in the ‘Conscience’ of the Indian… [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 8:43 am
The contribution challenges this view by countering it with the ambivalence of colonial law, which is permeated by the contradictions of the society of that time. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 2:52 pm by Ben Berwick, Rachel Homer
Legal Context To the Framers of the Constitution, the king’s appointment power was “the most insidious and powerful weapon of eighteenth century despotism,” one that the king used to appoint “‘miniature infinitesimal Deities’” to spread the “weeds of tyranny” across the colonies. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 12:00 pm by ernst
Taney’s progenitors went from indentured servant to High Sheriff of Calvert County, whose duties included the “disposal” of the colonial Anglican church’s property of women, including free white women, and their mixed race children, and slaveholding landowner married into the illustrious colonial family of Francis Scott Key.Roger B. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 8:40 am by Eugene Volokh
As early as the 1700s, several colonies and states barred any "attempt to overawe, affright, or force, any person qualified to vote, against his inclination or conscience,"[1] and some also barred, "after the … election is over, menac[ing], despitefully us[ing] or abus[ing] any person because he hath not voted as he or they would have had him. [read post]