Search for: "Consumer Law Associates, LLC" Results 481 - 500 of 2,167
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2020, 7:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
., LLC, 2020 WL 4698984, No. 1:17-cv-142-RJS-DAO (D. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 9:02 am by Abby Meyer
Based on these allegations, the court found the consumers plausibly alleged violations of five states’ false advertising laws. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 1:15 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Up until the Court of Appeal decision in Lloyd v Google LLC, many of these key legal issues had still not been fully considered. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 9:38 am by Mindy Harris
Supreme Court’s June 29, 2020 decision in Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 9:03 pm by Series of Essays
Abortion Restrictions After June Medical August 4, 2020 | Rachel Rebouché, Temple University Beasley School of Law After issuing its decision in June Medical Services LLC v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
National Collegiate Athletic Assn. (2018) and Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 6:43 am by Florence Campbell Jones
Italian and EU closed-ended Alternative Investment Funds may also exercise direct lending to persons other than consumers. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 8:29 am by Rebecca Tushnet
But .com might “also convey to consumers a source-identifying characteristic: an association with a particular website,” because only one entity can have a particular domain name at a time. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 9:19 am by Dennis Crouch
But if trademark law is about creating and protecting associations, it is not completely clear why the law’s protection should be limited to the many products going out to many buyers. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 9:48 am by Sean Mirski, Shira Anderson
Notably, none of the plaintiffs mentions common-law sovereign immunity, which may provide an independent source of immunity to foreign officials (who are not covered by the FSIA). [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
For Capital One, one purpose of the MSA and associated SOW was to ensure that Capital One could “immediately respond to any potential compromise of the security of its systems. [read post]