Search for: "Council v. State" Results 481 - 500 of 10,870
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2011, 2:23 am by sally
The costs relating to an exequatur (enforcement) procedure brought in one member state, in the course of which the recognition and enforcement was sought of a judgment given in another member state in proceedings seeking to enforce an intellectual property right, fell within article 14 of Parliament and Council Directive 2004/48/EC of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights (OJ 2004 L 157, p 45).” WLR Daily, 18th December 2011 Source:… [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 9:10 am by David
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court declined to hear the State's appeal in the case of Hogan v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 11:22 pm
Yesterday, the Canadian Federal Court issued an opinion in the case Canadian Council for Refugees, Canadian Council of Churches, Amnesty International, and John Doe v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 9:10 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Administrative Appeals Opinions Body: SC19090, SC19091 - FairwindCT, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2019, 5:54 am by INFORRM
 [34] In this case, in contrast to the usual practice, the category of “Persons Unknown” is not stated on the face of the order however it appears that requirements (1) to (3) and (6) were satisfied. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 2:09 pm
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) South Cambridgeshire District Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Ors [2008] EWCA Civ 1010 (05 September 2008) High Court (Technology and Construction Court) Fitzpatrick Contractors Ltd v Tyco Fire & Integrated Solutions (UK) Ltd [2008] EWHC 1927 (TCC) (25 July 2008) High Court (Patents Court) Oxonica Energy Ltd v Neuftec Ltd [2008] EWHC 2127 (Pat) (05 September 2008)… [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 4:00 pm
Check out all the delays discussed in this opinion by the Court of Appeal:"The first two pages of Eghtesad’s complaint bear the preprinted Judicial Council footer “COMPLAINT—Contract. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by tracey
Krolik and others v Polish Judicial Authorities: [2012] EWHC 2357 (Admin);   [2012] WLR (D)  254 “In the light of the presumption that Poland, as a member state of the Council of Europe, was able and willing to fulfil its obligations under the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, in the absence of clear, cogent and compelling evidence to the contrary, a strict approach would in future be adopted in deciding appeals… [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 4:15 am by Howard Friedman
In Council of Organizations and Others for Education About Parochiaid v. [read post]
4 Dec 0001, 4:00 pm by Michael Reiter, Attorney at Law
He next shows up at the February 6, 1989 San Bernardino Mayor and Common Council Meeting (from the minutes:) PUBLIC COMMENTS – THE SWORD A citizen, identifying himself as the Anti-Christ, also known as the Sword, Commander-in-Chief of the House of Ying during the battle of Armageddon, stated that the taping of all meetings of the Mayor and Common Council is [sic] required to be announced according to the Supreme Court decision of Davis v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 3:06 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Poulton v Ministry of Justice [2010] EWCA Civ 392 (22 April 2010) High Court (Chancery Division) Leeds Group Plc v Leeds City Council [2010] EWHC 810 (Ch) (21 April 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Crown Court Sitting At Croydon [2010] EWHC 805 (Admin) (24 March 2010) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 1:52 am by sally
Kasprzak v Warsaw Regional Court, Poland; Bingham v Trial Court No 4 of Marbella, Spain; Wilson-Campbell v Court of Instruction No 4 of Orihuela, Alicante, Spain [2011] EWHC 100 (Admin); [2011] WLR (D) 35 “Article 23 of the Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between member states, as implemented by s 36(3)(b) of the Extradition Act 2003, contemplated the possibility of agreement… [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 6:28 am by Andrew M. Ironside
The title of this post comes from this upcoming article by Professor Jeanette Wolfley, the abstract of which states: This past term the United States Supreme Court issued two decisions involving voting rights – Shelby County v. [read post]