Search for: "Cover v. Wilson" Results 481 - 500 of 774
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
I have also enjoyed learning about the different jurisdictions covered by the Privy Council. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 7:42 am by Joy Waltemath
Addressing  in the first instance what is meant by the phrase “public disclosure” pursuant to the False Claims Act, the appeals court adopted the approach held by the majority of circuits—that “disclosure” means being affirmatively revealed to the public at large—and eschewed the Seventh Circuit’s narrower interpretation, put to ill use by the district court below (U.S. ex rel Wilson v Graham County Soil and Water Conservation… [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:41 am by Janet Kentridge, Matrix
In Greater Glasgow Health Board v Doogan & Anor [2014] UKSC 68, the Supreme Court considered the ambit of the right under s 4. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 12:03 am by INFORRM
 The panel will be Lord Neuberger  Lady Hale, Lord Clarke Lord Wilson and Lord Toulson. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 1:01 pm by Emily Dorotheou, Olswang LLP
The case was heard by Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Clarke, Lord Wilson and Lord Carnwath. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
As discussed here, in Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi, v. [read post]
This trend first gained traction when Kemmons Wilson started the first hotel franchising of Holiday Inns in the 1950s, and picked up momentum in the next couple of decades when hotel operators decided to move hotel real estate off their balance sheets with sale-leaseback transactions, and when hotel investors bought hotels and elected to lease their hotels to professional hotel operators. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 6:28 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This is explained in a 1998, Houston Court of Appeals [14th Dist.] case styled, Williamson v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 2:01 pm by David Smith
Telchadder v Wickland Holdings Ltd [2014] UKSC 57 I will admit to being a bit cool on static caravan parks. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:03 am by Bryan Heaney
The appeal will be heard by Lady Hale, Lord Wilson, Lord Reed, Lord Hughes and Lord Hodge. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 6:52 pm
The particular Coeur d’Alene ordinance might not apply there, since it covers only “place[s],” and that might be limited to brick-and-mortar establishments; but similar ordinances in other places cover any “establishment,” and if a wedding photography service is an “establishment” then a minister who routinely takes officiating commissions would be covered as well. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
We had a news post about the decision which was also covered in the Press Gazette, on ITV News and in The Drum. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 1:16 pm by Dale Carpenter
Under this approach, the Sixth Circuit would consider itself bound by the one-sentence order in 1972’s Baker v. [read post]