Search for: "Craig v. State" Results 481 - 500 of 1,498
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
The gardener's relatives sue Danielle for wrongful death, claiming her actions created a risk of injury by foreseeably enraging Craig.[5] And a version of this problem arises with the "duty to retreat" that thirteen states still recognize in self-defense cases, and the more general "duty to comply with a negative demand" that seven states still recognize. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 3:01 am
Craig, Assistant Attorney General.Facts/Discussion: Appellant sought review of the district court's denial of his motion to dismiss based on the State's alleged violation of his rights under the Interstate Agreement on Detainers. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
I think that it's hard to make much of these statements by themselves; they simply reflect the Court's holding in Employment Division v. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 5:28 pm
It is, however, the substituted opinion for an earlier decision, Craig Clifford Busch v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 3:45 pm by Meg Martin
Summary of Decision issued February 16, 2010Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Vigil v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 5:38 am
Craig, Assistant Attorney General.Facts/Discussion: Temen was convicted of robbery and misdemeanor credit card fraud. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 3:45 am
Early last year, in State v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:14 pm by Kiran Bhat
United States, a challenge to the use of a state burglary conviction as a basis for enhancing a sentence for a federal crime under the Armed Career Criminal Act. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 3:12 pm by Jon Sands
§ 2244(d)(1), while a Nevada state prisoner loses under equitable tolling.McMonagle v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:21 pm by LII Team
  We’ve already told you about Georgia v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:19 pm by Nicandro Iannacci
The Constitution says that Congress (and the States) may not abridge the right to free speech. [read post]