Search for: "Cross v. Bear" Results 481 - 500 of 2,063
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2020, 4:57 pm by Juliette Passer, Esq.
 As a result, the proceedings are likely to be less confrontational since business executives will be subject to less of the intensive and difficult cross-examination that occurs in litigation, or even in domestic arbitration. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 4:38 am by Cristina Mariottini
The response to this question bears significant consequences in terms of defining the scope of application of the uniform rules on the free movement of persons, on the cross-border recognition of family statuses and on the ensuing patrimonial regimes. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 11:31 pm by Orin S. Kerr
[A fun case about cross-enforcement of the Fourth Amendment now before the Ninth Circuit.] [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 5:34 pm by David Kopel
District Court for the Central District of California upheld the new ban, on cross motions for summary judgement. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 10:37 pm by Maria Hook
Such an approach has become increasingly indefensible in a world that is witnessing unprecedented levels of cross-border mobility and migration. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 6:22 am by Robert Chesney
From time to time, the realm of public health crosses over into precincts that are familiar ground for national security law. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 7:37 am by Cyberleagle
The name is similar, but the White Paper’s duty of care bears scant resemblance to comparable offline duties of care.ES. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
A defendant bears the initial burden of establishing that it has been released from any claims (see Burgos v New York Presbyt. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 4:01 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Despite this minimal cost in the grand scheme of this multi-million-dollar litigation, the parties persist in arguing about who shall bear the cost. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
However the nature of any specific obligations under those agreements is beyond the scope of the cross-appeal. [read post]