Search for: "DAVIS v. DAVIS"
Results 481 - 500
of 8,975
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2023, 12:00 am
This weighty tome from Sweet & Maxwell is edited by Richard Davis, Thomas St Quintin and Guy Tritton from Hogarth Chambers, London. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 12:34 pm
appeared first on Drake, Hileman & Davis, PC. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 10:18 pm
The second ground, that Australia is an inappropriate forum, turns on application of the ‘clearly inappropriate forum’ test of the Australian forum non conveniens doctrine: Chandrasekaran v Navaratnem [2022] NSWSC 346, [5]–[8]; Sapphire Group Pty Ltd v Luxotico HK Ltd [2021] NSWSC 589, [77]–[80]; Studorp Ltd v Robinson [2012] NSWCA 382, [5], [62]. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Emmerich and Robin Panovka, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Saturday, January 7, 2023 Tags: Acquisitions, Board of Directors, Corporate governance, Mergers & acquisitions, SEC, Wachtell Lipton Top 5 SEC Enforcement Developments Posted by Haimavathi V. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Emmerich and Robin Panovka, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Saturday, January 7, 2023 Tags: Acquisitions, Board of Directors, Corporate governance, Mergers & acquisitions, SEC, Wachtell Lipton Top 5 SEC Enforcement Developments Posted by Haimavathi V. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 7:54 pm
Heller (2008) and in McDonald v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 11:33 am
Dykes v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 10:32 am
Davis discussed the end of U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 10:32 am
Davis discussed the end of U.S. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 12:15 pm
Davis v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
” I have no particular brief for high Federalists from New England, but I do wonder what we might think had Garrison actually been influential and several New England states accepted his view and tried to secede, say, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Prigg v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 1:48 pm
Davis et al. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
In Texas v. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 5:57 am
Reuben Clark Law School The Reports of My Death Are Greatly Exaggerated: The Continued Vitality of Worcester v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 10:29 am
Book Review, Mary Ziegler, Roe: The History of a National Obsession UC Davis law professor Ziegler (Dollars for Life) analyzes in this expert study how the Supreme Court’s 1973 Roe v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
But wisdom was in short supply in Jefferson Davis’s cabinet. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 2:50 pm
He wrote back to Madison, claiming a lack of legal experience and recommending John Davis, a Massachusetts judge, for the Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
Again, focusing just on the existing USNWR “top 50” for now:POTENTIAL LOSERS, PEER CHANGE:UC-Irvine (20 v. 37)Washington (36 v. 49)Colorado (36 v. 49)UC-Davis (24 v. 37)Wisconsin (31 v. 43)Boston College (27 v. 37)Emory (20 v. 30)There are a few others in the middle of some interest, because near the top smaller variations matter more. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
Again, focusing just on the existing USNWR “top 50” for now:POTENTIAL LOSERS, PEER CHANGE:UC-Irvine (20 v. 37)Washington (36 v. 49)Colorado (36 v. 49)UC-Davis (24 v. 37)Wisconsin (31 v. 43)Boston College (27 v. 37)Emory (20 v. 30)There are a few others in the middle of some interest, because near the top smaller variations matter more. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 3:00 pm
Less than two months later, a divided court made that decision official, in Dobbs v. [read post]