Search for: "DEAS V. STATE"
Results 481 - 500
of 660
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 5:09 pm
The analyst report expressed concern that PetMed’s marketing was likely to capture the attention of regulators, including the FDA and DEA. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 5:54 pm
By James V. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 7:41 pm
In a federal case I testified in recently (US v Simmons), the defendant's compliance with the Oregon Medical Marijuana Act was material in the case because in the application for search warrant, the DEA agent referenced the Ogden & Cole memos (which describe the U.S. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 12:00 am
Citing Deas v Levitt, 73 NY2d 525 and other decisions, the Appellate Division opined although "no individual had a vested right to be appointed to a vacant position — not even those whose scores placed them in the top three examinees", in this instance once individuals were appointed, they may have become entitled to damages or other relief based on Employer's alleged contractual breach, i.e., failure to make such appointments within the time frame… [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Citing Deas v Levitt, 73 NY2d 525 and other decisions, the Appellate Division opined although "no individual had a vested right to be appointed to a vacant position — not even those whose scores placed them in the top three examinees", in this instance once individuals were appointed, they may have become entitled to damages or other relief based on Employer's alleged contractual breach, i.e., failure to make such appointments within the time frame… [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 5:25 am
They observed what the DEA agent thought to be a phenylacetone laboratory. . . . [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 8:22 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 8:22 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 10:45 am
The case is Beaty v. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 2:03 pm
Additional Resources: Washington et al v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 7:42 am
The case, United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 1:16 pm
—People v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 6:26 am
The trial of the United States Government v. [read post]
17 Jun 2007, 10:03 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 9:19 am
Wiretap guru Judge Betty Fletcher (left) brings us a disappointing Title III decision this week in United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 4:26 am
New Fifth Circuit Judge Don Willett agreed with the majority that, under the current state of the law, the court was constrained to grant the defendants QI in Zadeh v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 9:25 am
Under U.S. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2022, 12:28 pm
The case is Empyreal Enterprises LLC v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 4:00 pm
In one such case, Kirk et al v. [read post]
