Search for: "DOES 1-68" Results 481 - 500 of 2,495
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2011, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
The ED therefore would have had to give reasons according to R 68(2) EPC 1973 for this request. [read post]
20 May 2012, 6:59 pm by Russ
“If you are profitable, the No. 1 reason is high taxes. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
Where does liability fall if a mistake is made that harms our clients? [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 8:31 am
Therefore, the inventors in this patent state that one of the objects of their invention is "to provide a hay cutting machine which is less prone to plugging than others presently available" (Col. 1, lines 66-68). [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 4:27 am by Jochen Vester (UK)
However, it does not yet reflect the finalisation of the market risk framework published in January 2019. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
’ [New York] Penal Law § 240.30(1)(a). [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 1:28 am by Rose Hughes
In T 68/99, for example the fact that certain features were disclosed as preferred in the application as filed acted as a pointer for a selected combination of features. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 6:40 am
Such a registration is subject to the same grounds for cancellation as a registration issued under Section 1 or Section 44(e), including abandonment. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
For instance, products 1 and 2 have not the same colorant composition although they are both referred to as “Igora Royal of nuance 4-68”. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 5:57 am
The questions referred by the French Court of Cassation read as follows: “1. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 10:47 am
With an introduction like that, it is no surprise that the A-G finds that trade mark registrations made with no intention to use may constitute bad faith, and that goods or services specifications which are vague and uncertain may be contrary to public policy within the meaning of Article 3(1)(f) Directive 89/104 and Article 7(1)(f) Regulation 40/94. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 9:20 am
A sleeping spouse or paramour does not have the same incapacity and is fundamentally different from a person who is “unconscious, or physically unable to communicate lack of consent. [read post]
28 May 2008, 6:42 am
Lew, 68 Cal.2d 774, 778 [69 Cal.Rptr. 102] (1968); In re George G., 68 Cal.App.3d 146, 155 [137 Cal.Rptr. 201] (1977); People v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 5:46 pm
What We Can Learn from the Rana Plaza Factory Building Collapse," that appears in the UC Irvine Journal of International, Transnational, and Comparative Law 1(1):11-66 (2016).The article was a contribution to a symposium, Transnational Legal Ordering and Private Law, held at UC Irvine School of Law. [read post]