Search for: "Day v Davis"
Results 481 - 500
of 2,493
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
The Company’s stock price decreased by approximately 21% the day after this announcement. [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:00 am
Fenrich of Davis Polk & Wardwell presented the defense position. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 11:23 pm
District Judge Michael Davis, who presided over the case, declareda mistrial. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 11:18 am
Case Name: Yvonne Fowkes v. [read post]
19 Jan 2019, 2:49 am
Grant’s second nominee, Cushing, received a favorable report from the Senate Judicial Committee, but Grant withdrew his nomination after five days, when allegations emerged that Cushing had corresponded with Jefferson Davis at the start of the Civil War. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 4:05 pm
On 11 July 2018 Nicola Davies J heard an application in the case of Piepenbrock v London School of Economics. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 9:55 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Loving v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 11:51 am
State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 2:02 pm
The Supreme Court will hear two appeals this week commencing with the two day hearing of R v Gnango on Monday 11 and Tuesday 12 July 2011 to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Judge, Kerr, Clarke, Dyson and Wilson. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 9:33 am
In the habeas matter of Wilkerson v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 9:11 pm
Solntsev, Anchugov & Gladkov v. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 10:17 am
Bernier v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 5:15 am
Davis had probable cause to believe that the bundle of cards in Chen's pocket was contraband. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 2:00 am
Davis v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 2:48 pm
ClearValue v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 6:49 am
Davis. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 9:44 am
Davies, 717 F. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 9:30 am
Davis v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 3:37 am
Multi blogmeister Jeremy posted a report of this decision [Resolution Chemicals Ltd v H. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 5:53 am
As noted in the New York Times’ editorial, Justice Anthony Kennedy seized the opportunity to write a concurring opinion in Davis v. [read post]
