Search for: "Day v. Mills" Results 481 - 500 of 958
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2008, 5:35 pm by Michael Stevens
Rock-Tenn Company, Mill Divisi     Eastern District of Tennessee of Chattanooga 08a0779n.06  Ndoci v. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 5:35 pm by Michael Stevens
Rock-Tenn Company, Mill Divisi     Eastern District of Tennessee of Chattanooga 08a0779n.06  Ndoci v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
" General Municipal Law §50-i(1) precludes commencement of an action against a city "for personal injury, wrongful death or damage to real or personal property alleged to have been sustained by reason of the negligence or wrongful act of such city," unless a notice of claim has been served in compliance with §50-e.In Mills v County of Monroe, 59 NY2d 307, cert denied 464 US 1018,  the Court of Appeals held that an employment discrimination… [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 6:14 pm
It seems to this Kat that the facts of an important case or the events of the day can determine how the law develops, without any overarching principle being followed.Patent law is clearly highly functional. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 4:49 am by Steven Gursten
And of these firms, an even smaller number have used this to create PIP mills. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[Ross v Oxford Academy & CSD, 187 AD2d 898, leave to appeal denied, 81 NY2d 705]Suspending an employee for 30 days without pay for engaging in conduct that may result in a safety hazard. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Day in Court or the Subtle Arts of Great Advocates 1 v. (1910) Wellman, Francis L. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[Ross v Oxford Academy & CSD, 187 AD2d 898, leave to appeal denied, 81 NY2d 705]Suspending an employee for 30 days without pay for engaging in conduct that may result in a safety hazard. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 6:45 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
October 21, 2019, was not a good day for J.B. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:31 am by Richard A. Epstein
  It follows therefore as the night the day, that coverage under the law cannot depend, as the  en banc Fifth Circuit held in Mills v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am by Eugene Volokh
A few days ago, the California attorney general’s office submitted its opposition, and we in turn submitted our reply. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 5:33 am by Matthew Waxman, Samuel Weitzman
Every student of national security law knows about Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]