Search for: "Derring v. State"
Results 481 - 500
of 564
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2010, 2:09 am
The Respondent in POEX Ltd. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 11:32 am
of State. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 3:27 am
Verhilft die Responsibility to Protect gar der Idee der Solidarität im Völkerrecht zum "Durchbruch", gibt es auf Kooperation basierende Verantwortung? [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 4:13 am
Nova Design Build, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:10 am
(IPblog) US General – Decisions District Court E D Wisconsin: Can a trade secret licensee state a claim? [read post]
14 May 2010, 7:26 am
DuMont Schauberg Expedition der Kölnischen Zeitung GmbH & Co KG. [read post]
8 May 2010, 6:52 am
Firma Deco Line and Mietz v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 4:04 am
Valley Entertainment, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 9:06 am
: how the case of Boy Scouts of America v. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 11:59 pm
Part V. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 2:36 pm
Accordingly, the proposals provide for an exclusive head of jurisdiction for court proceedings supporting arbitration in the civil courts of the Member States and the corresponding obligation of the courts in all other Member States to transfer parallel litigation to the courts of the Member State where the arbitration takes place. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 2:56 pm
On quantum for general damages, Ms Herelle had argued for assessment on the basis of a nominal reduction in rent, assessed as a percentage, following Niazi Services Ltd v Van der Loo [2004] EWCA Civ 53, and English Churches v Shine [2004] EWCA Civ 434, or, if the Court disagreed, then on the basis of the Wallace v Manchester 30 HLR 1111 'unofficial tariff'. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 2:56 pm
On quantum for general damages, Ms Herelle had argued for assessment on the basis of a nominal reduction in rent, assessed as a percentage, following Niazi Services Ltd v Van der Loo [2004] EWCA Civ 53, and English Churches v Shine [2004] EWCA Civ 434, or, if the Court disagreed, then on the basis of the Wallace v Manchester 30 HLR 1111 'unofficial tariff'. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 9:21 pm
The Court of Justice in its recent judgment of 6 October 2009, ICF v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 9:19 pm
Reference on Art. 1 Brussels I Regulation (C-406/09; Realchemie Nederland BV v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 8:43 am
, 'Non-signatories' and the long arm of arbitral jurisdiction Hans-Eric Rasmussen-Bonne, The pendulum swings back: the cooperative approach of German courts to international service of process Kurt Siehr, Internationale schiedsgerichtsbarkeit über kulturgut-streitigkeiten Lajos Vékás, About the Rome II regulation: the European unification of the conflict rules to torts Johan D. van der Vyver, The United States and the jurisprudence of… [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 4:38 am
The object of this case is a ruling of the Court of First Instance in Schräder v CPVO (Case T-187/06) mentioned on your website in November 2008 [here and here]. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
Stichting de Thuiskopie v Opus Supplies Deutschland GmbH(The 1709 Copyright Blog) ECJ: upholds ‘compulsory licences’ of Green Dot trade mark: Der Grüne Punkt-Duales System Deutschland GmbH v European Commission (JIPLP) ECJ: Manifest inadmissibility of reference for preliminary ruling in Canon Kabushiki Kaisha (C-181/09) (Class 46) (IPKat) Bud court asks ECJ: what is ‘acquiesced’? [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:09 am
Molen, G.H.J. van der. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 5:30 pm
The ED also stated its reasons for not being able to grant the main request and the auxiliary requests I, II, III, and V. [read post]
