Search for: "Desist v. United States"
Results 481 - 500
of 527
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
: L’Oréal v Bellure (IPKat) Is the ruling in L’Oréal v Bellure against the law? [read post]
29 May 2009, 12:41 am
In Nicaragua v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 8:45 pm
See Gray v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 12:17 am
" See Gray v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 6:36 am
The United States Supreme Court held in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:28 pm
(Techdirt) China Chinese developer sentenced to three years in jail for copyright infringement for creating QQ add-on (Techdirt) India Mattel files appeal in Scrabulous matter Jaitley v Singhvi again (Spicy IP) Japan Google to pay Japanese Society for Rights of Authors, Composers and Publishers (JASRAC) for music on YouTube (Content Agenda) Spain Court orders YouTube to remove content belonging to Telecinco (International Law Office)… [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
: Peer International Corporation, Southern Music Publishing Co and Peermusic (UK) Ltd v Editoria Musical de Cuba (IP finance) Justice Kitchin upholds British Beer and Pub Association and British Hospitality Association appeal against decision of Copyright Tribunal on basis for calculation of fees which members have to pay for background music (IPKat) Contempt of court: the risks of false testimony in trade mark infringement proceedings: KJM Superbikes Ltd v Hinton (IPKat) (IPKat)… [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 12:18 am
(Class 46) New Zealand Two for one in the House: Treaties and Anti-Counterfeiting Bill (International Law Office) South Africa 'Softlifting' adds to South African piracy woes (Afro-IP) Spain 'Theory of consumer error' rejected in criminal trade mark proceedings in Spain (Class 46) Switzerland Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property (IGE) reports progress in quest for improving legal protection for ‘Made in… [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 9:55 am
The case is titled Club De Futbol America v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 6:40 pm
The Court also concluded that a state "cease and desist" letter likewise did not justify the enhancement because it did not offer the defendant the chance to participate in the process in any meaningful way. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 11:33 pm
Following the Ninth Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: (IP finance), MARQUES international advertising portal goes live: (Class 46) Global - Patents Using patent landscaping analytics to improve the quality of M & A decisions: a review of Cox Enterprises’ $300M purchase of Adify: (IP Asset Maximiser Blog), Universities reap royalty rewards; investors ignore IP at their peril: (IAM), Top IP-owning nations claim faster patent processing; near harmonisation deal: (Intellectual Property Watch), Bosch, Xerox and Dupont sign up… [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 9:19 am
See Elektra v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 8:13 am
The complaint asserts that since Red Bull's introduction in 1996, over four billion units have been sold in the United States and over one billion dollars have been spent on advertising, marketing and promoting the Red Bull energy drink. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
, (Daily Dose of IP), 26 August: WIPO symposium on IP and multilateral agreements – Geneva: (IPKat), 11-12 September: US LSI: 4th annual conference on ‘Current issues in complex IP licensing’ – Philadelphia: (Patent Docs), 11 September/15 October: PLI seminar on developments in pharmaceutical and biotech patent law – New York/San Francisco: (Patent Docs), 15-16 September: UniForum & SAIIPL domain name ADR workshop – Centurion (South… [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 10:21 am
Following the Ninth Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 3:25 pm
Otero of the United States District Court for the Central District of California has ruled in UMG Recordings v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 11:08 am
In Canada v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 12:37 pm
The proposed federal laws are similar, providing for jurisdiction within the United States as a whole over any person who files a foreign lawsuit against "a United States person," where the United States person has assets in the United States against which the foreign plaintiff might execute the judgment. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 10:48 am
United States, 250 U.S. 616 (1919). [read post]
