Search for: "District of Columbia Government, Appeal of" Results 481 - 500 of 3,597
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2023, 4:05 pm by David Greene
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit supports X’s request for an en banc rehearing by all of the circuit’s judges; a three-judge panel ruled against X in July and its decision was unsealed in August. [read post]
The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit deferred to the agency, affirming the lower court’s decision to grant summary judgment. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 10:22 am
Dec. 28, 2010), the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit affirmed the dismissal with prejudice of a class action asserting securities fraud claims under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 12:05 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Collateral Consequences as a Consideration in the Right to a Jury Trial Calculation On June 21, 2018 the District of Columbia Court of Appeals sitting en banc rendered a decision inJean-Baptiste Bado v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 12:05 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Collateral Consequences as a Consideration in the Right to a Jury Trial Calculation On June 21, 2018 the District of Columbia Court of Appeals sitting en banc rendered a decision inJean-Baptiste Bado v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 7:42 am by Amy Howe
” After the full court of appeals denied rehearing, over the dissent of four judges, the District of Columbia government and the officers asked the Supreme Court to weigh in, which it agreed to do last winter. [read post]
30 May 2019, 9:20 am by Bob Ambrogi
Bar Board of Governors, which will decide whether to submit the recommendations to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, which sets the rules of practice within D.C. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 12:55 pm by Karen Gullo
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia to reverse a district court decision in Green v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 8:42 am
In this case, Prenda sued 1,058 Does (anonymous defendants identified only by an Internet Protocol address) in federal district court in the District of Columbia. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 10:01 am
Last week, D.C. officials appealed to the Court (District of Columbia v. [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 2:58 am by INFORRM
CIADecision Date: August 27, 2021 The District of Columbia Court of Appeals held that a Glomar response by intelligence agencies requires no degree of certainty and can be issued when there is a logical or plausible reason for the response. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 3:05 pm by INFORRM
WP Company LLCDecision Date: December 24, 2020 The single judge bench of the US District Court for the District of Columbia granted Washington Post’s motion of dismissal in the complaint filed by Representative Devin G. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 4:04 pm
State Department’s mandatory retirement at age 65 of certain employees policy violates Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA)  Miller v Clinton, United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit, Docket #10-5405 The United States Department of State terminated the employment of John R. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 2:15 pm by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled that it did not, the family went to the Supreme Court, which asked the federal government to weigh in. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 4:10 pm by kaplan4law
  We think that the trial court’s actions violated my client’ First Amendment rights and recently appealed this case to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
As previously reported, earlier this year the federal district court for the District of Columbia dismissed for lack of standing and ripeness challenges by Wheaton College and Belmont Abbey College to the mandate issued under the Affordable Care Act requiring group health insurance policies to cover contraceptive services for women. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 10:28 pm by Leland E. Beck
  The District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed another challenge to the HHS Affordable Care Act preventative services / contraception rule. [read post]