Search for: "Doe PL" Results 481 - 500 of 932
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2014, 11:29 am by Paralegal Mentor
~~~~~~~~~~This article was contributed by Kathy Sieckman, PP, PLS, ACP. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 6:45 am
With that being said, the Court continued to write that although the physical contact in this case may be offensive, it does not rise to the level of physical menacing. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 2:16 pm by Ken White
The Ninth Circuit noted that there might be one remaining area where Gertz does not apply and a defamation plaintiff does not need to prove even negligence — if the plaintiff is a private figure and the speech is not on a matter of public concern. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:02 pm by Andrew Frisch
Defendant does not create work schedules for the dancers, but rather permits them to work at other clubs and to “come and go as they please. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 6:45 am
 The film is a MUST-SEE for Mary Poppins's devoted fans and copyright enthusiasts alike, in that it does not just highlight the personal and moral bound between an author and his/her works, but shows very well why copyright matters. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
Therefore, the Court found that the evidence "does not establish a prima facie proof of all the elements of the crime charged." [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:17 pm by Stephen Bilkis
This is a proceeding wherein the defendant was charged under Indictment number 98027 with two counts of Sexual Abuse in the First Degree under PL § 130.65, a D violent felony, and Endangering the Welfare of a Child under PL § 260.10, an A misdemeanor. [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 3:49 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Petitioner admitted running a numbers operation out of the premises, but contended that gambling should not be illegal and in any event does not constitute a public nuisance. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 2:03 am
The first of these crimes, NY PL 156.05, is a misdemeanor offense while the latter two, NY PL 156.30 and NY PL 156.35, are both felony crimes. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 2:56 am
Knowledge of the order, according to the court, does not hinge upon the service of the order of protection - whether proper or improper. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 2:32 am
Any criminal defense attorney can advise that winning one battle does not mean you have or will win the war. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 8:47 am by James Eckert
  PL 265.02(1) applies to those who have previously been convicted of a crime. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The proposal does not involve any loss of rights for the applicant. [read post]