Search for: "Doe v. Doe, III." Results 481 - 500 of 10,829
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2023, 9:59 am by Russell Knight
More importantly, the fact that [the franchisee] put the new stores into the old corporations does not evince an intent to donate the old stores to the marriage. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 1:20 am by Giesela Ruehl
Abgrenzungen und Wirkungen im Verhältnis zum nationalen und völkerrechtlichen Kollisionsrecht, Beiträge zum ausländischen und internationalen Privatrecht 139, Mohr Siebeck 2023 (XXVI, 693 p.) [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am by Norman L. Eisen
Expand all Collapse all Relevant Court Proceedings United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This statement does not necessarily deny deference to agency interpretations as it seemingly focused on the first step in the Chevron test, viz whether there is ambiguity in the legislative text with regard to the issue at hand. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
If the respondents win, do they therefore lose, because the logic of their argument makes the funding of the Supreme Court itself--and thus everything it does--unconstitutional? [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Item 402(v)(2)(iii)(C)(1)(v) is referring to awards that were forfeited and the cumulative reported value of that award is $0. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 3:25 am by David Lynn
(iii) pay versus performance disclosure must tagged using in Inline XBRL; (iv) while it is permissible to combine one or more sets of pay versus performance relationship disclosures into one graph, table, or other format, an issuer must still provide separate XBRL tags for each required item; using different XBRL elements to tag the same reported line item on the income statement from period to period; and (v) in situations where an issuer uses a custom tag, the Staff may requests… [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 3:30 am by David Lynn
Question 128D.17 – The fair value of an award that did not meet vesting conditions during the year because the performance or market conditions were not met, but for which there is still potential for the award to vest in the future, should not be subtracted under Item 402(v)(2)(iii)(C)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K because it failed to vest in the current year. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 2:15 am by Anna Maria Stein
  The Board acknowledged that the prompting process may involve creativity, but this does not mean that providing text prompts to Midjourney (even if in a large number as 624 revisions and text prompts) “actually forms the generated images”. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
§ 2(c)(2)(D)(ii)(III)(aa) (exempting contracts of sale that result in actual delivery within 28 days from the definition of retail commodity transaction); see also Final Interpretive Guidance, Retail Commodity Transactions Involving Certain Digital Assets, 85 FR 37734, 37737–38 (June 24, 2020). 6 Id. [read post]