Search for: "Doe v. Doe Governmental Entity" Results 481 - 500 of 1,563
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2020, 11:30 am by John Elwood
Courts of Appeals for the 1st, 4th and 11th Circuits hold; does it instead create a jury question, as the U.S. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 12:13 pm by Jacklyn Fetbroyt
 It requires financial institutions and governmental entities to compile, maintain, and submit data to the CFPB regarding credit applications submitted by women-owned, minority-owned, and small businesses. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 7:40 am by John Elwood
Courts of Appeals for the 1st, 4th and 11th Circuits hold; does it instead create a jury question, as the U.S. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 11:18 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Therefore, contractual silence is not enough and ambiguity does not provide a sufficient basis to infer consent. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am by John Elwood
Courts of Appeals for the 1st, 4th and 11th Circuits hold; does it instead create a jury question, as the U.S. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 8:13 am by CFM Admin
If a manager runs a website that does not collection personal information, then no separate disclosure is needed for the website. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 7:23 pm
  One moves here across a broad arc of governance that jumped into popular consciousness even as it remains shrouded in complexity. 2019 brought us both a muscular law that has been used to constrain political decision making in the United States and Britain, and increasing acceptance of governmentalization of the private sector which is increasing governing through data analytics rather than rules. 2019 was the year that liberal democracies embraced more warmly the notion of law… [read post]
The appellate court rejected this argument because the commercial speech exception does not require a completed transaction and it can apply even if the movant is an employee instead of the entity formally selling the goods or services. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm by Colleen V. Chien
For example, in Engquist v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 3:52 am by Jessica Jones, Matrix Chambers
Because the majority considered that it needed to draw a clear distinction between military activity in an area, and governmental control of an area (only the latter being sufficient to bring a person acting on behalf of a non-State entity within the terms of s 134), it was necessary for the order of the Court of Appeal to be amended, and so the appeal was allowed to that very limited extent. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 3:42 am by Jessica Jones, Matrix Chambers
An earlier domestic judgment, R v Zardad, also supported the position that a person acting on behalf of a non-State entity may be acting in an official capacity for the purposes of s 134 if the non-State entity “had a sufficient degree of organisation, a sufficient degree of actual control of an area and […] exercised the type of functions which a government or governmental organisation would exercise” [63]. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Researchers said this suggests overconfidence can help lobbyists make connections with important people but does not necessarily lead to them being able to influence policies. [read post]