Search for: "Does One to Fifty" Results 481 - 500 of 3,987
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2021, 6:38 am by Jane Turner
This is one of the ways that exposes the rich and powerful to the full weight of the law and what it does is deter the rich and powerful from what is probably many temptations. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 8:01 am
(emphasis added).Incongruous as such a legal regime would be, it would at least be an originalist one. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 8:53 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  It is trivially easy to use the emotional framing of future generations for any purpose one likes. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 3:00 am by Shea Denning
  Fifty-two percent of convictions for which a BAC level was recorded had a BAC in the .08 to .14 category. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Specifically, she would have taxed only wealth above $50 million, but she quite deliberately wanted to tax wealth, not income.In a positive assessment of that proposal at the time, I wrote: Thus, the person with that extra one dollar of wealth would pay two percent of the dollar that his wealth exceeds fifty million. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Specifically, she would have taxed only wealth above $50 million, but she quite deliberately wanted to tax wealth, not income.In a positive assessment of that proposal at the time, I wrote: Thus, the person with that extra one dollar of wealth would pay two percent of the dollar that his wealth exceeds fifty million. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
Twenty-one states do not require a permit for concealed carry. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 4:00 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Over fifty amicus curiae briefs and third party observations referring to Article 115 EPC were received from various organisations, companies, patent attorney firms and individuals. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 4:48 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  While Public Resources Code § 21167.6.5(d) does provide that dismissal under CCP § 389(b) is inappropriate for a petitioner’s failure to name parties not identified as real parties in interest in the lead agency’s NOD, it does not provide for the converse proposition, i.e., that dismissal is mandatory for failure to name and join identified real parties. [read post]