Search for: "E. Digital Corp"
Results 481 - 500
of 652
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2010, 6:49 pm
Luckern issued a notice indicating that ALJ E. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm
As I’ve mentioned here previously, PFF has been rolling out a new series of essays examining proposals that would have the government play a greater role in sustaining struggling media enterprises, “saving journalism,” or promoting more “public interest” content. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 10:59 am
The e-book agreements, with CBS Corp.'s Simon & Schuster and News Corp.'s HarperCollins Publishers, mirror deals struck this year with Apple for the iPad: Some new best sellers will be priced at $9.99 but most will be priced at $12.99 to $14.99. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Blog) US Patents – Decisions Split Federal Circuit panel finds preamble language not limiting: Marrin v Griffin (GRAY on Claims) (Inventive Step) District Court E D Texas: Inequitable conduct expert could not testify as to materiality absent qualification as a person skilled in the art: Advanced Technology Incubator, Inc v Sharp Corporation et al (Docket Report) District Court N D California: Intracompany patent transfer strikes again: Two… [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 3:39 am
(Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Jury finds for plaintiff in VirnetX v Microsoft (EDTexweblog.com) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Microsoft - Microsoft sues maker of four-minute exercise machine for typosquatting: Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 1:28 pm
”10 The FCC also proposes creation of a Digital Literacy Corps, modeled after President John F. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 8:46 am
Costco Wholesale Corp., 2010 U.S. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 2:25 am
Digital Alchemy c/o Ramon Felciano, FA0911001295928 (Nat. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 7:17 am
Pacific Gas & Electric Co., a unit of PG&E Corp., got a taste of the public-relations risk last summer when it installed smart meters in Bakersfield, Calif., as part of a broad upgrade in its Northern California service territory. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 5:55 am
Apr. 6, 2009). http://bit.ly/9SIjjv Matter of Hearst Corp. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 1:12 pm
(E. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 12:29 pm
Idaho Nov. 2, 2009). http://kuex.us/71a1 Attorney-Client Privilege: Gentex Corp. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 7:21 pm
Images were sent by wire and the receiving machine recorded the images on damp electrolytic paper.1867The typewriter becomes available.1877Carbon paper invented.1881The mimeograph invented.1890West Publishing introduces Key Numbers1938Xerography developed.1944First electronic digital computer, ENIAC, weighing in at 30 tons and containing 18,000 vacuum tubes. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 3:17 am
Traffic Information LLC(Docket Report) District Court E D Virginia: Cookies-functional web browser was ready for patenting when initial draft of source code was logged into repository: Netscape Communications Corp., v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 5:31 am
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law) United States US General iSlate, iTablet, IP! [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(GRAY On Claims) District Court E D Louisiana: Prior License of asserted patent does not bar imposition of permanent injunction: Innovention Toys, LLC v MGA Entertainment, Inc. et al(Docket Report) District Court N D California: Delay of five to seven years does not create undue prejudice sufficient to deny stay pending reexam: Spectros Corp v Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc (Docket Report) BPAI: Reissue cannot merely add new dependent claims (without cancelling the broader claims):… [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 3:46 am
(Patent Infringement) District Court E D Texas: Defense wins JMOL at conclusion of plaintiff's case in Marshall patent trial: Southwest EFuel Network, LLC v Transaction Tracking Technologies, LLC (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas denies stays pending ex parte and inter partes reexam:Zapmedia Services, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 11:03 pm
It likely covers "trade libel," even outside the special context of commercial advertising, Unelko Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 4:37 am
(IP Litigation Blog) District Court E D Virginia: Stay pending reexam denied because a stay would result in ‘more significant’ prejudice given the Court’s overall speed in disposing patent cases: Telecommunication Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 4:16 am
As a result, Corp Fin issued a controversial interpretive release in mid-1998, using Item 303 of Regulation S-K - ie. [read post]
