Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 481 - 500
of 7,356
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2023, 12:41 pm
In NLRB v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 7:47 am
There was no evidence English law would be fundamentally unfair or deprive Noble House of a remedy simply because it had a shorter state of limitations. [read post]
3 May 2023, 6:16 am
His Honour Judge Hacon handed down judgment in AutoStore v Ocado on 30 March 2023. [read post]
2 May 2023, 2:32 pm
In Fox v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 6:40 am
Fund v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 6:10 am
Under State v. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 1:48 pm
From Judge Paul Maloney's opinion Friday in Al Qassimi Academy v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
That was certainly true of the recent Supreme Court oral argument in Counterman v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
Unfortunately, these days many employment contract termination (and other) provisions have a Waksdale problem and are invalid or at least open to challenge in the wake of Waksdale v Swegon North America 2020 ONCA 391. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 2:46 pm
" Separation of Church & State Comm. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 7:12 pm
In early English and U.S. history, threats were punished regardless of the speaker’s intent, the state contends. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 1:50 am
As a matter of English law, if a state, as principal, represents that a person had authority to act on its behalf, it will be bound by the acts of that person with respect to anyone dealing with him as an agent on the faith of that representation (Attorney General of Ceylon v Silva (AD) [1953] A.C. 461). [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 2:00 am
Groff v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 2:00 am
Groff v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 5:36 am
The question arose again in Democratic Republic of the Congo v. [read post]
One of the Stiffest Charges Against Jan. 6 Insurrectionists Hangs on by a Thread in the D.C. Circuit
11 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
Although the dissenting opinion cites Bond v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 7:38 am
Holt v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:47 pm
Audit system could be a solution, involvement of member states could be a solution, but we have to discuss the issues openly. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 5:18 am
Similarly, Hacon HHJ stated in Teva v Novartis [2022] EWHC 2847 (Pat): “It seems that there was little or no interaction between Novartis’ three experts during the preparation of their evidence. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 4:19 pm
A summary of the facts The case of Macatė v. [read post]
