Search for: "Employer Benefit Services, Ltd."
Results 481 - 500
of 627
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2012, 8:10 am
In evaluating the Defendant’s motion, the Court emphasized on three of the six factors used to determine whether a person is considered an “employee” of the FLSA: (1) the degree of the alleged employer’s right to control the manner in which the work is to be performed; (2) the worker’s opportunity for profit and loss depending upon his managerial skill; and (3) the degree of permanence of the working relationship (the three factors the Court did not consider… [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 2:50 am
It supplies tools, services and personnel to the oil industry. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 4:00 pm
Canac terminated the plaintiff's employment after 24 years' service, at the age of 55, and provided him only with his minimum employment standards entitlements to notice, severance and benefits continuation during the eight week statuory notice period. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:22 am
However, his new employer did not provide any disability benefits. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 7:00 pm
Cambridge Spring Service (2001) Ltd. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 3:07 pm
The Background In this case, the plaintiff was a long-service employee of some 20.5 years service with the employer. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm
It is possible to argue that an RP may derive benefits from performing his/her role and hence make further compensation unnecessary. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 6:34 am
For instance, the Competition Commission of Singapore has recently penalized members of the Association of Modeling Industry Professionals for fixing the rates of modeling services in Singapore. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 3:30 pm
Cambridge Spring Service One of the primary issues of this appeal was whether the Employment Standards Act ("ESA")could support an employee's claim for common law damages. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:33 am
Such activities could no longer include work benefiting other members of the household, such as performing housekeeping or laundry services for the household. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 7:54 am
Caterpillar Logistics Services (UK) Ltd v Huesca de Crean [2011] EWHC 3154, a decision last month from Mr Justice Tugendhat is one of those slightly misplaced creatures, a case with intellectual property content but which ends up in a non-IP court (in this instance, the Queen's Bench rather than the Chancery Division of the High Court for England and Wales). [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 8:15 am
Steel’s defence basically relied on the unexpected economic downturn as justification for not honouring undertakings involving maintaining steady employment and continued steel production of two plants. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 9:21 pm
Advisory Services and First State Trust Company. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:25 am
When we carefully analyze this section, the wisdom of the legislature becomes quite evident and clear that the legislature was keen to ensure respect for the personal liberty and also pressed in service the age-old principle that an individual is presumed to be innocent till he is found guilty by the court. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 4:59 am
Also in October we had the introduction of the Agency Workers Regulations, which give those workers with contracts of employment with a job agency but who actually toil for an “end user” elsewhere a modicum of protection on pay and benefits after 12 weeks continuous service. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 1:31 pm
In 2002, she filed suit against her employer, Long Island Care at Home, Ltd. and its owner, alleging that she was not paid minimum wages and overtime wages to which she was entitled under the FLSA and a New York statute, and she sought a judgment for those unpaid wages. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
This article examines what Wal-Mart and AT&T mean for future employment class actions. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 12:06 pm
A host of homegrown rivals are growing quickly, including Vancouver-based ContractTailor and Toronto-based Dynamic Lawyers Ltd. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 3:15 am
Perpetual Trustee Company Ltd v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc; and Belmont Park Investments PTY Ltd v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc, heard 1 – 3 March 2011. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 2:45 am
Perpetual Trustee Company Ltd v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc; and Belmont Park Investments PTY Ltd v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc, heard 1 – 3 March 2011. [read post]
