Search for: "English v. English"
Results 481 - 500
of 11,160
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2007, 10:28 am
Ordinarily it would not be just to permit service outside the jurisdiction unless there was a real prospect of a legitimate benefit to the claimant from the English proceedings. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 4:04 am
In Albemarle Corp. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 8:30 am
In Krupski v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 3:33 am
" Palm Bay Imp., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2009, 7:09 am
An English-language summary is here. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 4:57 am
But yesterday’s oral argument in Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:21 am
The Inclusive Communities Project in Plain English. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 9:01 am
In Caresse Navigation Ltd v Office National d’Electricite (The Channel Ranger) [2013] EWHC 3081 (Comm), the court considered whether a reference in a bill of lading to the incorporation of a charterparty “English law and arbitration” clause should be read as referring to a clause in the relevant charterparty which conferred jurisdiction on the English court. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 12:59 pm
Take Monday's short-as-can-be decision in Briscoe v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:25 pm
The case was Cullen v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 11:00 pm
The third section of the article focuses on ongoing litigation in Binyam Mohamed v Secretary of State and Al Rawi v Secretary of State, where the Claimants attempt to expose the role played by the British Government in their detention at Guantanamo Bay. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 10:19 am
In a European cross-border patent abuse claim, the English courts could assume jurisdiction only if the first steps of the alleged abuses took place within the jurisdiction or if immediate damage was cause to the plaintiff there. [...] [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 10:01 am
Fisher v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 2:18 am
Those looking for a clear statement that pre-nuptial agreements are akin to contracts in English law will be disappointed. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 3:19 pm
But... well, let's let the court tell it:During oral argument, Patel claimed he was unable to speak English; however the court has reviewed the recording of the oral argument in Mayflower v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:37 am
In Mujur Bakat Sdn Bhd v Uni. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 4:22 pm
In Virginia Office of Protection and Advocacy v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 10:07 am
Let’s talk about King v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:28 pm
Referring to last Term’s Bond v. [read post]
