Search for: "F-T Finance, Inc."
Results 481 - 500
of 555
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2008, 12:00 am
, (Intellectual Property Watch), (Out-Law), (Electronic Frontier Foundation), The UK High Court allows computer program patent claims in Astron Clinica & Ors v The Comptroller: (IPKat), (BLOG@IP::JUR), (Filemot), (IAM), (The IP Factor), (IP Updates), (IMPACT), (IPcentral Weblog), (Out-Law), (IPBiz),Tarceva (Erlotinib) - Roche patent infringement action against CIPLA before Delhi High Court: Many posts at: (Spicy IP) and… [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP finance),Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / BrandsICANN supports Google’s fight against domain-tasting: (Class 46),Global - PatentsSoftware patents and startup innovators: (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property),Co-inventor: yes or no? [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 2:32 pm
” The Court noted “[a]n important elaboration” of ministerial/discretionary analysis is the “functional test” announced in Friends of Westwood, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 8:23 am
Exeter Finance Corp. (5th Cir. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 5:24 pm
” (Citing, inter alia, Ocean View Estates Homeowners Assn., Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 12:56 pm
It was reported recently that Santander Consumer USA Holdings, Inc. [read post]
30 May 2024, 12:35 pm
Bantam Books, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
The Court, referring to its 2007 Grand Chamber judgment in Anheuser-Busch Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
After graduating from Penn in 1988, Strine clerked for John F. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 4:34 pm
The trial court and the Court of Appeals ruled against the Buyers.AnalysisIn reversing the decisions of the trial court and Court of Appeals, Justice Kittredge described the standard as follows:[F]or a court to vacate an arbitration award based upon an arbitrator’s “manifest disregard for the law”, the “governing law ignored by the arbitrator must be well defined, explicit, and clearly applicable. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 4:34 pm
The trial court and the Court of Appeals ruled against the Buyers.AnalysisIn reversing the decisions of the trial court and Court of Appeals, Justice Kittredge described the standard as follows:[F]or a court to vacate an arbitration award based upon an arbitrator’s “manifest disregard for the law”, the “governing law ignored by the arbitrator must be well defined, explicit, and clearly applicable. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
It doesn’t. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 7:01 pm
Sorrell, Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 4:43 am
by Professor John F. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
Price improvement without competition, though, isn’t necessarily the best price improvement. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 11:23 am
Aluminum Co. of America, 148 F.2d 416 (2nd Cir. 1945) – Alcoa involved allegations by the Justice Department that Alcoa and many of its international subsidiaries had monopolized both interstate and foreign commerce in the manufacture and sale of “virgin” aluminum ingot, and had joined in a conspiracy in restraint of such commerce with another defendant, Aluminum Limited. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 11:23 am
Aluminum Co. of America, 148 F.2d 416 (2nd Cir. 1945) – Alcoa involved allegations by the Justice Department that Alcoa and many of its international subsidiaries had monopolized both interstate and foreign commerce in the manufacture and sale of “virgin” aluminum ingot, and had joined in a conspiracy in restraint of such commerce with another defendant, Aluminum Limited. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 11:23 am
Aluminum Co. of America, 148 F.2d 416 (2nd Cir. 1945) – Alcoa involved allegations by the Justice Department that Alcoa and many of its international subsidiaries had monopolized both interstate and foreign commerce in the manufacture and sale of “virgin” aluminum ingot, and had joined in a conspiracy in restraint of such commerce with another defendant, Aluminum Limited. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:12 pm
However, “[i]f the project may have significant effects, but mitigation measures will make the effects insignificant, the agency may adopt a mitigated negative declaration. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 9:24 am
The Answer Is “No” But wait, you may ask, can’t anyone litigate CEQA issues under the rubric of a broad “public interest” standing? [read post]
