Search for: "FRENCH v. STATE" Results 481 - 500 of 3,098
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2011, 9:29 am by Team
On October 11th 2011, the 4th section of the ECHR stated that masked police officers “should be required to visibly display some anonymous means of identification – for example a number or letter” (Hristovi v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 9:29 am by Team
On October 11th 2011, the 4th section of the ECHR stated that masked police officers “should be required to visibly display some anonymous means of identification – for example a number or letter” (Hristovi v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 5:55 pm
The Supreme Court has granted a petition, signed by the Solicitor General and several high-profile lawyers in the US Departments of State, Commerce, and Energy, to review the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's decision United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
Accused persons remain in a state of uncertainty, often in pre-trial detention. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The European Court declared the application admissible and not manifestly ill-founded ([25]), but concluded on the merits of the case that the conviction of the applicants because of breach of the French Copyright Act did not amount to a violation of Article 10 of the Convention by the French authorities. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 9:56 am by Bill Heinze
According to Professor Wegner, yesterday, "at the opening of the oral hearing in the Zhejiang High People's Court in Chint v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 5:11 am by Yishai Schwartz
” The Second Circuit rejected this logic holding that Daimler—and its own related circuit precedent, Gucci America, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 6:25 am by Sheldon Toplitt
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)Lawrence Lessig, Harvard Law School Professor and champion of a less copyright-restricted Internet, last month joined forces with the Electronic Frontier Foundation to file suit in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts against a Melbourne, Australia-based record company that accused the professor of infringing on a copyrighted song by using it in a lecture presented on YouTube.In his 11-page complaint, Lessig v. [read post]