Search for: "Federal Express Corporation v. Focus Corporation"
Results 481 - 500
of 564
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2010, 8:20 am
On December 8 the Federal Circuit issued its first post-Bilski opinion on patentable subject matter when it decided Research Corporation Technologies Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 10:22 pm
Abstract: This research predicts that the way the media frames the events leading up to a Supreme Court decision and immediately after the decision has shifted from a policy focus to a strategy focus. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 10:38 am
Nightingale Home Healthcare, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am
The “McLibel” litigation illustrated the inequality of arms when two individuals faced a massive libel claim brought by multinational corporations. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 2:00 am
FN7 Although not discussed by the parties, we acknowledge that this Court has expressed, albeit in dicta, a different view in Standard Oil Co. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 10:35 am
Senator Rockefeller Releases Investigative Report, Requests Information from Credit Card Companies and issues a Supplemental Report The Senate Commerce Committee was one of the first federal bodies to express concern with certain advance consent marketing practices. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 5:51 am
In the end, he determined that the Rights Plan was subject to the enhanced scrutiny test under Unocal Corporation v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 5:01 am
A recent decision, Foundation of Human Understanding v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 4:18 am
Co. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:25 am
-Conn (IPKat) (EPLAW) EWHC (Ch): All threats, no action…: Best Buy Co Inc and another v Worldwide Sales Corporation Espana SL (IPKat) United States US General California’s Trade Secret disclosure statute doesn’t apply in Federal Court – or maybe it does (IP ADR Blog) US Patents USPTO wants to change restriction practice (Patent Baristas) The post-Bilski landscape: Why some tried, but failed, to ban ‘business method’… [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 6:07 am
Hale v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 7:39 am
Federal Election Commission. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:26 pm
But I think that an exclusive focus on judicial restraint misses something essential about Stevens. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 9:22 am
Thus, the legislation gives shareholders a say on pay and proxy access, ensures the independence of compensation committees, and requires companies to set clawback policies to take back executive compensation based on inaccurate financial statements as important steps in reining in excessive executive pay and helping shift management’s focus from short-term profits to long-term growth and stability.Say on PayThe legislation would enhance corporate governance and mandate… [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 8:17 am
Aristotle International, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 3:39 pm
Monagan: if the FTC isn’t going to act, do you focus on the violation of the FTC Guidelines? [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:11 am
In its coverage, the ACS Blog notes that “public financing systems like Arizona’s [are] one way to counter the enormous flow of corporate dollars into elections following…Citizens United v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 7:16 am
” In non-nomination news: The BLT reported yesterday that Acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal has notified the Court that some of the information provided to the Justices by a federal official and used in the recent juvenile life-without-parole case Graham v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 2:37 pm
Federal Election Commission (from the decision that invalidated a law, previously upheld, that restricted corporate funding of election campaigns). [read post]
