Search for: "Federal v. Levine"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,207
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2013, 10:45 am
The recent United States Supreme Court decision in the case of United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 10:45 am
The recent United States Supreme Court decision in the case of United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 9:33 pm
” The impetus for Congress to adopt this government-wide immunity provision was the Supreme Court’s decision in Westfall v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 7:37 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), PLIVA v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 9:49 pm
The case is Madigan v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:28 am
An amendment should specifically overturn Kohl v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 5:25 pm
Amgen v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 4:25 pm
Amgen v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 2:01 pm
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009)). [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Ct. 2466 (2013), and PLIVA v. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 3:56 pm
Attorney Sharon Cohen Levin, asset forfeiture unit chief in the southern district of New York, describes the government's investigation in court papers filed in United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm
My article, "The Cooperative as a Proletarian Corporation: The Global Dimensions of Property Rights and the Organization of Economic Activity in Cuba" has just been published and will appear in Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business 33:527-618 (2013). [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
In the first, Vance v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
“[C]ompliance with federal laws and regulations concerning a drug, though pertinent, does not in itself absolve a manufacturer of liability. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Ohio 2009), which distinguished Levine and held a claim that a drug was “‘unreasonably dangerous . [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 10:16 am
First, in 2009 in Wyeth v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 1:32 pm
Levine. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 5:25 pm
State-law design-defect claims based on the adequacy of a drug’s warnings are preempted by federal law under a 2011 Supreme Court decision, PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 12:50 pm
In Bartlett v. [read post]
