Search for: "Fields v. Eu"
Results 481 - 500
of 882
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2022, 9:00 pm
Hughes III, Milbank, on Tuesday, November 22, 2022 Tags: ALJs, Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 4:45 pm
Microsoft is calling for the US and the EU to follow Australia in introducing rules that require technology companies to share revenue with news organisations and support journalism. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 4:04 pm
The OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media Harlem Désir has welcomed changes made to Malta’s Media and Defamation Bill, but at the same time, encourages improvements in several fields. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 4:38 am
SanDisk, a US company, imported and sold MP3 players for which no Sisvel licences had been granted in the EU. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 2:59 am
The aim of this article is to assess whether the piecemeal regime existing at the EU level risks undermining the protection of EU consumers. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 4:38 am
Does the EU need one? [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 9:05 pm
A recent example is the case of Marchand v. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 3:47 am
Readers might for instance recall the recent judgment in Sekmadienis Ltd v Lithuania [Katpost here], in which the ECtHR considered that a prohibition to use in advertising the image of Jesus and Mary on grounds of public morals should be regarded as an undue compression of the applicants' own freedom of expression under Article 10 ECHR. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 5:24 am
What is the continued relevance in this context of the direct v. indirect taxation distinction? [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 8:02 am
At this point, I envision my next post on App Store matters on May 3, when the Epic Games v. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 7:25 am
Wang Jiangqiao, a judge at the Hangzhou Internet Court said that the court “behave[s] as an ‘incubator’ for Internet space governance, a ‘test field’ for Internet judicial rules, a ‘leader’ for diversified Internet disputes, and a ‘first mover’ for the transformation of Internet trials” with China having “set up three Internet courts in Hangzhou, Beijing and Guangzhou. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 1:46 pm
Again, the idea is to ensure that TUPE does not go further than EU law requires, and also to provide clarity as to when dismissals and variations are permitted. 4. [read post]
1 Sep 2024, 2:04 am
In summary, to be lawful, a quotation must have a reason: specifically, there must be “the intention of entering into ‘dialogue’ with that work”.Turning to pastiche (Article 5(3)(k) InfoSoc Directive and section 30A CDPA), as noted, there is not yet an EU-wide definition of it. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 1:06 am
As things develop in this field more and more legal question will have to be answered; however, this writer has been pondering its effects on copyright specifically, and what the future might hold, particularly in relation to authorship. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 3:18 pm
The situation under EU law is instructive. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:23 pm
For example, in Lucasfilm v Ainsworth [2011] UKSC 39 the Supreme Court held that acts of copyright infringement in a non-EU country under foreign copyrights can be determined by the English courts. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 11:45 am
A: because in the EU you do have choices. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 9:30 pm
It has been argued that EPSU is a consequence of the Barroso 2 EU Commission (2009-2014) when “the Commission opposed the idea that legislation in the social policy field could be triggered by initiatives outside its control. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 4:12 am
Change of practice The Federal Supreme Court held that a diverging practice between the CJEU and the Swiss courts in the field of SPCs could be a serious reason for a change in practice of the Swiss law. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 8:39 am
In a cross-border shooting case, Hernandez et al. v. [read post]
