Search for: "Fish v. United States"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,691
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2019, 9:17 am
H.R.184: To transfer administrative jurisdiction of certain Federal lands from the United States Army Corps of Engineers to the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs, to take such lands into trust for the Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 11:21 am
United States, 459 F.2d 631, 635 (9th Cir. 1972); see also, Black v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 3:39 pm
Supreme Court Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2019-2020update.htmlPetition for certiorari was filed in one case on 6/19/20:United States v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:42 am
The Humane Society of the United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 4:42 am
State v. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 1:39 pm
As the judge points out in United States v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 1:29 pm
The United States. [read post]
21 May 2009, 3:47 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:11 am
California and United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 10:51 am
In granting the Defendant’s motion, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York held that plaintiff failed to state a claim because she did not to set forth “any approximation of the number of unpaid overtime hours worked . . . or any approximation of the amount of wages due. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 8:08 am
See United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:51 am
” In 1984, in United States v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 4:56 am
Retail Fish Inc. v Todtman, Nachamie, Spizz & Johns, P.C. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 7:10 pm
Delegation of Authority Regarding Certification of Countries Exporting Shrimp to the United States, 56 Fed.Reg. 357 (Dec. 19, 1990). [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 5:04 am
United States, the well-publicized "fish case" from 2015. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 10:18 am
United States (Federal Tort Claims Act) Simmons v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 4:09 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 8:08 am
The Circuit Court then certified the question to the Appellate Court of whether the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. [read post]
