Search for: "Ford Motor Co., Appeal of" Results 481 - 500 of 504
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2007, 9:00 am
Take for example the San Francisco product liability case against Ford Motor Co. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 10:00 pm
Ford, GM Ask UAW To Administer Health Care Benefits Ford Motor and General Motors officially have asked the United Auto Workers to assume responsibility for the health care benefits of more than 1.5 million working and retired employees. [read post]
12 Aug 2007, 6:25 am
Ford Motor Co    Eastern District of Michigan at DetroitSee UAW v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 9:00 am
The first trial held in 2003 ended in Ford Motor Co.'s favor. [read post]
25 May 2007, 3:51 am
Supreme Court on Monday ordered reconsideration of a $55 million punitive damage award assessed against Ford Motor Co. for an Explorer sport-utility vehicle rollover accident that left a California woman paralyzed. [read post]
17 May 2007, 9:00 am
Supreme Court on Monday set aside a San Diego jury's $55 Million award against Ford Motor Co. for a rollover accident involving its popular Explorer sport utility vehicle, according to an article in the Los Angeles Times. [read post]
16 May 2007, 3:20 pm
Savage had this article in the LA Times on the High Court's decision to send a case involving a $55 million jury award against Ford Motor Co. back to a California appeals court for further consideration in light of the recent Philip Morris vs. [read post]
9 May 2007, 5:25 pm
Instead, the citations are typically disapproving references to precedents relied on by district courts or to arguments made by the party who would lose on appeal. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:00 am
Ford Motor Co., 849 F.2d 460, 461 (9th Cir. 1988) [7] Id [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 3:55 pm
., who represents Ford Motor Co. and other firms that are fighting large punitive verdicts, said the ruling would be very helpful to corporate defendants. [read post]
18 Mar 2007, 5:04 pm
Ford Motor Co., 142 F.3d 955, 958 (7 Cir.1998) that only fees already incurred at the time that federal jurisdiction is invoked, not anticipated fees, may be counted toward the requisite amount in controversy. [read post]
18 Feb 2007, 6:30 pm
  There, the panel found that the Canadian subsidiaries of DaimlerChrysler and Volvo were "juridical persons" of the United States because they were controlled by a U.S. parent (DaimlerChrysler Corporation and Ford Motor Co., respectively)  (The panel considered it irrelevant that DaimlerChrysler Corporation may in turn be controlled by another person). [read post]