Search for: "G.L. " Results 481 - 500 of 543
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2021, 7:36 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
 Plaintiffs argued that the expansive and stringent ABC test found in the Commonwealth’s Independent Contractor statute, G.L. c. 149, § 148B, also determined whether a third-party can be liable for wage-related violations. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 9:51 am by Pulgini & Norton, LLP
According to G.L. c. 152 section 25A(2)(b) and (c), the self-insurer secured a bond from XL Reinsurance, purchased reinsurance, and then denied a request for reimbursement by XL, according to the reinsurance agreement. [read post]
27 May 2016, 6:10 am
This post examines an opinion from the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts,Suffolk:  Commonwealth v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 7:05 am
In 1989, the Massachusetts legislature amended two sections of the state Consumer Protection Act (G.L. c. 93A) to read: "For the purposes of this chapter, the amount of actual damages to be multiplied by the court shall be the amount of the judgment on all claims arising out of the same and underlying transaction or occurrence, regardless of the existence or nonexistence of insurance coverage available in payment of the claim. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 6:20 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
As we discussed in that resource page, Massachusetts G.L. c. 231 Section 60B, establishes the requirement for a tribunal for malpractice cases against healthcare providers. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 11:01 am by Daniel Cappetta
Under that framework, the defendant assert[ed] that, to provide constitutionally effective assistance, counsel must warn clients about consequences of sex offender registration when they are considering whether to plead guilty to a ‘sex offense’ as defined in G.L. c.6, §178C. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 9:43 am by Pulgini & Norton, LLP
Instead, the employer’s “self-insured” status is one created by G.L. c. 152 section 25A , and the self-insurer is in fact regulated by the department. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 7:29 pm by Eugene Volokh
Milot, through an affirmative act of theft in violation of G.L. c. 266, § 30, stole a firearm from the home of Hughes, the owner, who had placed trust in him. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 12:54 am
It is important to understand prior to forming such an instrument, that general creditors may use the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA) under G.L. c. 109A to void or rescind a transfer by a individual debtor for less than fair consideration, regardless of whether the transfer is to an individual or a trust. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 2:42 pm by Mike Aylward
In 1989, the Massachusetts legislature amended two sections of the state Consumer Protection Act (G.L. c. 93A) to read: “For the purposes of this chapter, the amount of actual damages to be multiplied by the court shall be the amount of the judgment on all claims arising out of the same and underlying transaction or occurrence, regardless of the existence or nonexistence of insurance coverage available in payment of the claim. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 8:30 am by Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
On December 13, 2021, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (“SJC”) issued its long-awaited decision determining that the Massachusetts Independent Contractor Statute, G.L. c. 149, § 148B (“Independent Contractor Statute”), which establishes the three-pronged “ABC” test used to classify workers as independent contractors or employees – and provides for a rebuttable presumption that workers are employees unless the purported… [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 7:05 am
In 1989, the Massachusetts legislature amended two sections of the state Consumer Protection Act (G.L. c. 93A) to read: "For the purposes of this chapter, the amount of actual damages to be multiplied by the court shall be the amount of the judgment on all claims arising out of the same and underlying transaction or occurrence, regardless of the existence or nonexistence of insurance coverage available in payment of the claim. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 9:23 am by Heidi A. Nadel
Gillette alleged that the former employees misappropriate trade secrets and other confidential information to develop a wet-shaving razor for the benefit of their new employer, ShaveLogic.ShaveLogic counterclaimed, alleging that Gillette filed its lawsuit in bad faith.Gillette moved to dismiss, arguing that its filing of the lawsuit was petitioning activity protected by the anti-SLAPP statute, G.L. c. 231, section 59H, and was protected by the litigation privilege. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 9:43 am by Pulgini & Norton, LLP
Instead, the employer’s “self-insured” status is one created by G.L. c. 152 section 25A , and the self-insurer is in fact regulated by the department. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 9:23 am by Heidi A. Nadel
ShaveLogic counterclaimed, alleging that Gillette filed its lawsuit in bad faith.Gillette moved to dismiss, arguing that its filing of the lawsuit was petitioning activity protected by the anti-SLAPP statute, G.L. c. 231, section 59H, and was protected by the litigation privilege. [read post]