Search for: "GRAY V DEFENSE"
Results 481 - 500
of 574
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
Elston Self Service Wholesale Grocs (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) New York Yankees – NY Yankees oppose BASEBALLS EVIL EMPIRE for clothing: New York Yankees Partnership v Evil Empires, Inc (TTABlog) New York Yankees – NY Yankees oppose THE HOUSE THAT JUICE BUILT; applicants assert parody defense: New York Yankee Partnership v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 4:43 pm
Gray, and a private individual, Charles J. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 6:12 pm
According to Capital Defense Weekly, executions are scheduled in Ohio, Tennessee, and Indiana before the year ends. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 9:40 am
Supreme Court ruled it unconstitutional to execute offenders with mental retardation in the case of Atkins v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Class 99) United States US General Wisconsin judge vacates $ 1.26 billion judgment in default against PepsiCo (IPKat) (IP Factor) California Court of Appeal: Von Dutch tradename settlement gives rise to legal malpractice action and questionable mediation confidentiality decision: Michael Cassel v Superior Court of Los Angeles County (The IP ADR Blog) US Patent Reform Putting the USPTO to work for independent inventors (Director's Forum) (Inventive Step) (IP Asset Maximizer Blog)… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v Samsung Elecs. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Class 99) United States US General Wisconsin judge vacates $ 1.26 billion judgment in default against PepsiCo (IPKat) (IP Factor) California Court of Appeal: Von Dutch tradename settlement gives rise to legal malpractice action and questionable mediation confidentiality decision: Michael Cassel v Superior Court of Los Angeles County (The IP ADR Blog) US Patent Reform Putting the USPTO to work for independent inventors (Director's Forum) (Inventive Step) (IP Asset Maximizer Blog)… [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 5:15 pm
But see this week’s opinion in U.S. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 5:15 am
These people are the salt of the earth and there is no gray in their lives. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee: Balsam Coffee… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Or on life support, at least - MEI v JCM American Corp stayed pending outcome of Mars v Coin Acceptors (Property, intangible) O2 Micro - ITC judge grants in part O2's motion for summary determination of importa [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Or on life support, at least - MEI v JCM American Corp stayed pending outcome of Mars v Coin Acceptors (Property, intangible) O2 Micro - ITC judge grants in part O2's motion for summary determination of importa [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 8:13 am
The Justices will consider Defense Department v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 10:48 am
County of Fairfax, Va., 907 F.2d 1459, 1469 (4th Cir. 1990); compare Gray v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 3:39 pm
In R&R Capital, LLC v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 11:08 pm
This brings the case within the gray area known as "arguable probable cause," a defense to false arrest cases. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 6:59 pm
As you know, it has long been held that counsel fails to preserve for appellate review legal insufficiency claims when he has failed to raise the issue in a specific TOD motion (see, People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10 [1995]). [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
– unusually entertaining cases before the CAFC: Cornish v Doll (Patently-O) The Independent Inventor’s Handbook (IP Watchdog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC affirms that patent ownership (and standing) can vest through operation of law: Sky Technologies v SAP AG (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Property, intangible) CAFC en banc: Methods do not have exportable components and therefore method claims cannot be infringed under… [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 7:35 am
In 1995, in People v Gray (86 NY2d 10 [1995]) the Court of Appeals held that a motion for a trial order of dismissal on the grounds of insufficiency of proof must specify the insufficiency in order to preserve the issue for review. [read post]
