Search for: "Generes v. Justice Court (People) (1980)"
Results 481 - 500
of 723
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2020, 12:19 pm
The new legislation will temporarily modify the Magistrates’ Court Act 1980. 3.3 To continue to enable the principle of open justice, the Bill also sets out measures to allow public participation in proceedings carried out via video or audio link. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 12:14 pm
The parties had been neighbors since the 1980’s and there had been a series of incidents. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 7:11 pm
In Riley v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm
And Supreme Court Justice Samuel Chase, the first and only Supreme Court Justice ever impeached, refused to excuse jurors claiming prejudice and denied defendants the opportunity to make their case. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 7:09 am
Purposivism was premised on this underlying notion that courts should interpret statutes so as to “carry out the purpose as best they can”… And by the 1980s, many people believed, and this is most prominently, the late Justice Scalia, the purposivism and intentionalism were basically proxies for judges doing whatever the heck they wanted. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
The current Supreme Court has at least three members who seem strongly influenced by originalist constitutional theory--Associate Justices Amy Coney Barrett, Neil Gorsuch, and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
As Justice Powell stated in 1980, and it still remains true, “this ‘means’ test has been virtually impossible to satisfy,” as Justice Powell said in Fullilove v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
In this respect, the Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs has taken steps to reprint the Constitution in light of the decision of the Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
As shown below, the California Department of Justice (“DOJ”), which enforces Section 26820, applies the law to ban the display of any picture or physical depiction of a handgun. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:30 am
Term Limits v. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 6:40 pm
Snyder, 83 N.J. 478, 487 (1980). [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:30 am
Justice Ewaschuk of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 10:45 am
Although some of those claims go as far back as 2000, justices with the Iowa Supreme Court recently ruled plaintiffs would be limited to damages solely from the last two years. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 7:40 am
Someone has whispered in his ear that it might be worth putting a few quid on Mr Justice Vos to move over to the Patents Court. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:49 pm
S. 74 (1980). [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:29 am
Courts had long adapted common-law rules to “new conditions arising out of modern progress”; now they should recognize that “the upper air is a natural heritage common to all of the people. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 10:41 am
Likewise for Twitter letting people go to individual pages such as http://twitter.com/RealDonaldTrump, Facebook letting people to go to individual Facebook pages, YouTube letting people view individual videos, and the like. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 10:39 am
If the Supreme Court sticks with the eyewitness rule, Carpenter v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 4:30 am
The Supreme Court upheld Bush’s action based on his broad statutory powers to exclude aliens from U.S. soil (see Sale v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
Given Justice Neil Gorsuch’s reaction during the recent argument in Timbs v. [read post]
