Search for: "Government's Response to Motion in Opposition"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,368
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2018, 3:00 pm
The Court’s Ruling In denying the Trump administration’s motion to dismiss our lawsuit Thursday, U.S. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 6:42 am
Arbitrarily imposed Internet restrictions that are not tethered to those objectives are inconsistent with the administrative regime governing CSL offenders. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 9:40 am
Not shrinking from the fight, California AG Becerra filed a formal opposition to the request for preliminary injunction, a motion to dismiss the suit, and a legal brief. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 6:45 am
Next Steps and Implications CMS filed a Motion to Alter Judgment in the New Mexico Health Connections case and a hearing was held on June 21, 2018. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 12:50 pm
Not shrinking from the fight, California AG Becerra filed a formal opposition to the request for preliminary injunction, a motion to dismiss the suit, and a legal brief. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 12:50 pm
Not shrinking from the fight, California AG Becerra filed a formal opposition to the request for preliminary injunction, a motion to dismiss the suit, and a legal brief. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:04 pm
Now later documents in the case, such as defendant's motions to dismiss and to compel, and plaintiff's exhibit to his response to one of defendant's motions, are sealed, too. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:25 pm
This sentiment is inappropriate for a Commission charged with the solemn responsibility of fair and neutral enforcement of Colorado's antidiscrimination law—a law that protects discrimination on the basis of religion as well as sexual orientation. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 4:58 pm
I also voted for Groia, more because I believe in having diverse and even conflicting voices within governing bodies, to foster better decision making. [read post]
21 May 2018, 7:18 am
Suffice it to say, though, that if the government’s goal truly was “speedy resolution of this interlocutory appeal,” opposing intervention had the opposite effect. [read post]
20 May 2018, 4:13 pm
Malaysia TV3 has been ordered to pay RM1.1M to opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim in a defamation lawsuit. [read post]
18 May 2018, 7:13 am
The court observed that “state law will trump contrary contract provisions when the statute provides for nondelegable or nonmodifiable duties and responsibilities in connection with the functions of state government. [read post]
18 May 2018, 6:05 am
Finding that equity weighed in favor of NAI and Redstone, the court denied the plaintiffs’ motion for a TRO. [read post]
15 May 2018, 5:15 am
In response to United’s motion, Plaintiffs made two arguments that were … what’s the word? [read post]
11 May 2018, 2:25 pm
In fact, the opposite is true. [read post]
11 May 2018, 1:01 pm
Old and Modern Harris County Courthouse Once you (are forced by the Texas Supreme Court to) accept the premise that the government is entitled to win in civil disputes with citizens because the government is the government -- a modern version of "The King Can Do No Wrong" -- and that it is the job of the courts to apply that principle and shut the courthouse door to victims of the government's agents it's easier to… [read post]
10 May 2018, 9:02 am
” For additional information concerning background check issues governed by state and local law, see the “Step-by-Step Guidance for Complying with the FCRA and State Mini-FCRAs. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:28 am
In opposition to the motion to cancel the lis pendens, the plaintiff argued that his alleged managerial rights and duties, and his claim for a constructive trust, fell within the statute’s requirement that the claims affect, if not title, at least the possession, use, or enjoyment of realty. [read post]
6 May 2018, 9:01 pm
I would hold myself responsible as part of the government” and identifying the focus on immigration targets as “policy working as intended. [read post]
2 May 2018, 2:15 pm
” Instead, under R Enterprises, “the motion to quash must be denied unless the district court determines that there is no reasonable possibility that the category of materials the Government seeks will produce information relevant to the general subject of the grand jury's investigation. [read post]
