Search for: "Governmental Employees Insurance Company"
Results 481 - 500
of 798
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2014, 8:48 am
Department of Health and Human Services, often called the “contraceptives mandate,” under which companies are required to provide their employees with health insurance that covers a broad array of contraceptives, including some that may function as abortifacients. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 4:17 am
The only endorsement, and it’s only an endorsement in the most abstract sense, is that a for-profit company abides by the law that requires it to provide its employees with health insurance. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 5:55 pm
(I realize that in cases such as Hobby Lobby, a religious objectors could claim that he views direct payment to a health insurance company — but not payment to the government that then pays the money to the company — as religiously forbidden complicity with abortion. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:46 pm
” The Act requires employers with at least fifty employees either to provide minimally adequate health insurance to their employees, including coverage for preventive care without cost-sharing, or to pay a tax of $2,000 per employee (after the first thirty employees) to defray the cost of public subsidization of the employees’ healthcare. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:11 pm
After lower courts denied each company a preliminary injunction, the companies appealed in their respective jurisdictions. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 1:50 pm
Accordingly, and as Justice Alito stresses, the effect of this accommodation on the women employed by Hobby Lobby and the other companies involved in these cases "would be precisely zero. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 11:17 am
The owners of Hobby Lobby sincerely believe that it’s wrong for them to buy their employees insurance plans that they see as supporting abortion. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:14 am
” The Court rejected arguments based on the difficulty of ascertaining the “beliefs” of large, publicly traded corporations and that the mandate itself requires only insurance coverage. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:38 am
*It is not a viable solution to tell these companies that they can forgo providing health insurance coverage at all, given the owners’ beliefs that providing health insurance is consistent with their religious beliefs, and given the monetary penalties associated with failing to provide coverage. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 11:03 am
They later added a third defendant, Russell Corporate Groups, Inc., the landscaping company. [read post]
28 May 2014, 2:48 pm
Stamer is nationally and internationally recognized for more than 24 years of work helping private and governmental organizations and their management; employee benefit plans and their sponsors, administrators, fiduciaries; employee leasing, recruiting, staffing and other professional employment organizations; schools and other governmental agencies and others design, administer and defend innovative compliance, risk management, workforce, compensation,… [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:16 pm
Greimas’s Essay “The Semiotic Analysis of A Legal Discourse: Commercial Laws That Govern Companies and Groups of Companies”. [read post]
15 May 2014, 6:41 am
It has a reactive component (what companies must do after a breach) and a proactive component (what companies must do to protect personally identifiable information they control regardless of whether they ever suffer a breach). [read post]
15 May 2014, 6:41 am
It has a reactive component (what companies must do after a breach) and a proactive component (what companies must do to protect personally identifiable information they control regardless of whether they ever suffer a breach). [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 5:50 pm
I guess the impression that they were trying to convey is that they must be a successful company to have such nice office space and room for lots of employees. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 5:50 pm
I guess the impression that they were trying to convey is that they must be a successful company to have such nice office space and room for lots of employees. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 12:00 pm
In other instances, U.S. companies have pointed to machinations that appear to favor one company in particular in procurement actions. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 5:20 am
Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland It has long been the law that generally employees lack the right to bring a private cause of action under the Davis Bacon Act (DBA). [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
To satisfy RFRA, the government must justify its regulations under strict scrutiny; that is, the government must demonstrate that its regulations are the least restrictive way to further a compelling governmental interest. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 5:40 am
P. 2015(c)(1) is more specific; that rule requires that the debtor;o Keep a record of receipts and the disposition of money and property received;o Comply with §704(a)(8) and include a statement, if payments are made to employees, of the amounts of deductions for all taxes required to be withheld or paid for and in behalf of employees and the place where such amounts are deposited; ando Give notice of the case, ASAP after the petition date,… [read post]
